PokerStars Hand #130218079120: Holdem No Limit ($0.08/$0.16 USD) - 2015/02/09 20:53:31 CET [2015/02/09 14:53:31 ET]
Table Agassiz 6-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: UmbeBrenes ($16 in chips)
Seat 2: STIROL ($22.27 in chips)
Seat 3: Emp1k ($16 in chips)
Seat 4: Revirlost ($16 in chips)
Seat 5: DoC.LemOn ($38.56 in chips)
Seat 6: BarbosaPTB ($29.17 in chips)
Emp1k: posts small blind $0.08
Revirlost: posts big blind $0.16
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to DoC.LemOn 
DoC.LemOn: calls $0.16
BarbosaPTB: raises $0.48 to $0.64
UmbeBrenes: folds
STIROL: folds
Emp1k: folds
Revirlost: folds
DoC.LemOn: calls $0.48
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $1.52)
DoC.LemOn: checks
BarbosaPTB: bets $1.28
DoC.LemOn: calls $1.28
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $4.08)
DoC.LemOn: checks
BarbosaPTB: bets $2.08
DoC.LemOn: raises $3.92 to $6
BarbosaPTB: raises $3.92 to $9.92
DoC.LemOn: calls $3.92
River (Pot : $23.92)
DoC.LemOn: checks
BarbosaPTB: bets $17.33 and is all-in
DoC.LemOn: calls $17.33
Showdown
BarbosaPTB: shows 
(two pair, Aces and Eights)
DoC.LemOn: shows (three of a kind, Eights)
DoC.LemOn collected $57.08 from pot
Summary
Total pot $58.58 | Rake $1.50
Board
Seat 1: UmbeBrenes folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 2: STIROL (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 3: Emp1k (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: Revirlost (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: DoC.LemOn showed and won ($57.08) with three of a kind, Eights
Seat 6: BarbosaPTB showed and lost with two pair, Aces and Eights
1
|
1
 |
Santafairy Korea (South). Feb 09 2015 22:24. Posts 2233 | | |
would you ever click back turn? |
|
| It seems to be not very profitable in the long run to play those kind of hands. - Gus Hansen | |
|
|
1
 |
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Feb 09 2015 22:55. Posts 15163 | | |
if we were deeper yeah hes like 80/60 or something mad- think he'll shove or at least bet river a ton tho as is. I was considering it tho
I'm surprised you guys don't give me flak for limp calling preflop - seemed like a viable option here this deep tho |
|
| 93% Sure! | Last edit: 09/02/2015 23:04 |
|
|
1
 |
Mardagg Germany. Feb 09 2015 23:42. Posts 843 | | |
If you do it then dont do it with a hand as weak as J8s.
Almost all suited connectors and 1 gapers play much better postflop than J8s. |
|
|
1
 |
4TM United States. Feb 10 2015 00:09. Posts 712 | | |
Misclick pre or using a limping strategy? |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Feb 10 2015 01:05. Posts 15163 | | |
limp was on purpose here
don't think I wanna raise this and face a 3bet some 30% of the time from the dude oop? I'm not really stealing the blinds when I raise either ever, so raising didn't make much sense but I should be able to make a limp +ev here? |
|
| 93% Sure! | Last edit: 10/02/2015 01:08 |
|
|
1
|
4TM United States. Feb 10 2015 01:43. Posts 712 | | |
| | On February 10 2015 00:05 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
limp was on purpose here
don't think I wanna raise this and face a 3bet some 30% of the time from the dude oop? I'm not really stealing the blinds when I raise either ever, so raising didn't make much sense but I should be able to make a limp +ev here? |
How often do you estimate your limp will be raised here?
edit: not sure how I missed the explanation of limp before my first comment |
|
| | Last edit: 10/02/2015 02:06 |
|
|
1
|
YoMeR United States. Feb 10 2015 02:23. Posts 12438 | | |
ehhh i don't like the limp pre. not with this hand anyways. we aren't going to be winning money even vs a maniac OOP. folding seems best. |
| |
|
|
1
|
4TM United States. Feb 10 2015 02:31. Posts 712 | | |
| | On February 10 2015 01:23 YoMeR wrote:
ehhh i don't like the limp pre. not with this hand anyways. we aren't going to be winning money even vs a maniac OOP. folding seems best. |
OFC? |
|
|
1
| |
surprised you didn't fold river |
|
| Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same | |
|
|
1
|
soberstone United States. Feb 10 2015 04:46. Posts 2662 | | |
Once you checked river was he value-betting hoping you caught your Qc and were gonna bluff catch his missed draw? I can't see him bluffing.
I'm confused. |
|
|
1
 |
Highcard Canada. Feb 10 2015 05:53. Posts 5428 | | |
| | On February 10 2015 03:34 TalentedTom wrote:
surprised you didn't fold river |
+1 |
|
| I have learned from poker that being at the table is not a grind, the grind is living and poker is how I pass the time | |
|
|
1
|
Ryan Neilly United States. Feb 10 2015 05:59. Posts 1639 | | |
i make it a tad bigger ott |
|
|
1
|
RaiZ France. Feb 10 2015 19:00. Posts 1503 | | |
| | On February 10 2015 03:34 TalentedTom wrote:
surprised you didn't fold river |
May I know why ? It's so confusing for me... I mean given the action so far there was no way this queen helped him except AQ ? Or were you thinking about 8Q ?
All those lines were simply retarded, I'd have called it all day.  |
|
| Shin-il : Yeah it was very very very good for me too. Rekrul : YOU MOTHER FUCKING FUCKING SON OF A BITCH | |
|
|
1
|
Santafairy Korea (South). Feb 10 2015 19:22. Posts 2233 | | |
well RaiZ i'm not an expert but this is how i understand it: because here he only beats something like 67hh 22 AJ that was turned into a bluff. min3bet OTT is 95% the nuts regardless of opponent, like here villain is 80/60 which means in the later streets he has to be extremely nutty compared to earlier streets and lemon shouldn't expect him to shove river with less than trips for value. not everyone is good enough to lay it down but in this case 87 77 AA QQ all filled up, Q8,K8,A8 always dominated him so he is calling to split vs J8,T8,98, and he blocks J8 anyway so we would expect lemon to fold here 95% of the time for balance |
|
| It seems to be not very profitable in the long run to play those kind of hands. - Gus Hansen | |
|
|
1
| |
I think TT meant Doc is a nit. Not sure though |
|
|
1
| |
| | On February 10 2015 03:46 soberstone wrote:
Once you checked river was he value-betting hoping you caught your Qc and were gonna bluff catch his missed draw? I can't see him bluffing.
I'm confused. |
He's not thinking in terms of value bets versus bluffs. He's just a fish with a pair of aces piling it in. |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Feb 11 2015 11:39. Posts 15163 | | |
| | On February 10 2015 18:40 SpasticInk wrote:
I think TT meant Doc is a nit. Not sure though |
yeah I made a retarded time out fold and posted it the other day  |
|
| 93% Sure! | Last edit: 11/02/2015 11:40 |
|
|
|
Contact Users: 703 Active, 2 Logged in - Time: 04:47
Canada. Feb 10 2015 04:34. Posts 20070
