PokerStars Hand #130405446904: Holdem No Limit ($0.05/$0.10 USD) - 2015/02/12 23:22:04 WET [2015/02/12 18:22:04 ET]
Table Belisana II 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: xicotaSLB ($25.35 in chips)
Seat 2: mfkill ($25.16 in chips)
Seat 3: isildurzero ($11.04 in chips)
Seat 5: sodek85 ($48.04 in chips)
mfkill: posts small blind $0.05
isildurzero: posts big blind $0.10
Rándzso: sits out
xicotaSLB: posts the ante $0.02
mfkill: posts the ante $0.02
isildurzero: posts the ante $0.02
sodek85: posts the ante $0.02
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to xicotaSLB
sodek85: raises $0.12 to $0.22
xicotaSLB: raises $0.37 to $0.59
mfkill: folds
isildurzero: folds
sodek85: raises $1.21 to $1.80
xicotaSLB: raises $1.70 to $3.50
sodek85: calls $1.70
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $7.15)
sodek85: checks
xicotaSLB: bets $3.20
sodek85: calls $3.20
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $13.55)
sodek85: checks
xicotaSLB: checks
River (Pot : $13.55)
sodek85: bets $11
xicotaSLB: raises $7.63 to $18.63 and is all-in
sodek85: calls $7.63
Showdown
xicotaSLB: shows (two pair, Aces and Deuces)
sodek85: shows (a pair of Tens)
xicotaSLB collected $49.89 from pot
Summary
Total pot $50.89 | Rake $1
Board
Seat 1: xicotaSLB (button) showed and won ($49.89) with two pair, Aces and Deuces
Seat 2: mfkill (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: isildurzero (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: sodek85 showed and lost with a pair of Tens
1
|
xicotaSLB   Portugal. Feb 13 2015 00:32. Posts 1128 | | |
4bets T9s, calls 5bet oop, callcbet T62ssd, xx 4d, bets 11/13 otr as bluff,calls shove .
He is a reg, is this a good note for this hand..?
|
|
|
1
|
fira   United States. Feb 13 2015 00:37. Posts 6345 | | |
yeah the preflop play is interesting, though i don't think it's bad
also his decision to bet river like that is pretty weird, i'm guessing it's a bluff trying to move u off JJ-KK? doesnt seem like it would work often |
|
|
1
|
traxamillion   United States. Feb 13 2015 06:55. Posts 10468 | | |
yea his river play is contradictory and retarded. maybe he was hallucinating and thought he had the nuts |
|
|
1
|
KeyleK_uk   United Kingdom. Feb 13 2015 13:25. Posts 1687 | | |
probably put what you had in the hand as well in your note, he's gonna remember this hand too.. maybe . |
|
poker is soooo much easier when you flop sets | |
|
|
1
|
SuFF   Poland. Feb 13 2015 15:03. Posts 447 | | |
dont make notes that tells a story, u wont get that during a hand, or at least u wont get any conclusion.
Figure out what that hands tell u and write that as simple as possible. Id just write "moron" but thats not good advice
"goes crazy deepstacked" is a good note
id also add "dont bluff raise him on the river" or "nonbeliever"
with not confirmed info i add (?) so i know its not sure read |
|
| Last edit: 13/02/2015 15:07 |
|
|
1
|
devon06atX   Canada. Feb 13 2015 22:27. Posts 5459 | | |
| On February 13 2015 14:03 SuFF wrote:
"goes crazy deepstacked" is a good note
|
It's a deepstack table mon frere |
|
|
1
|
SuFF   Poland. Feb 13 2015 23:13. Posts 447 | | |
|
|
1
|
devon06atX   Canada. Feb 14 2015 14:41. Posts 5459 | | |
so - making a note 'goes crazy when playing deepstacked' is fucking retarded since they're always deepstacked |
|
|
1
|
SuFF   Poland. Feb 14 2015 16:17. Posts 447 | | |
take a while and think whats the difference between note:
"pretty crazy"
"went super crazy 250bb deep"
hint: ppl dont bluff that much when 250bb deep
another hint: some people dont always play only deep stack tables but i dunno maybe thats just fucking retarded to mix tables
|
|
|
1
|
devon06atX   Canada. Feb 14 2015 19:23. Posts 5459 | | |
| On February 14 2015 15:17 SuFF wrote:
take a while and think whats the difference between note:
"pretty crazy"
"went super crazy 250bb deep"
hint: ppl dont bluff that much when 250bb deep
another hint: some people dont always play only deep stack tables but i dunno maybe thats just fucking retarded to mix tables
|
So you wanna be condescending eh.
These two in particular are always 250bb deep on these tables.
If you don't understand how pointless that note is, then I don't know what to tell you.
hint: It's ok to be wrong.
another hint: Shouting in an argument doesn't make you right.
Happy Saturday dude |
|
|
1
|
devon06atX   Canada. Feb 14 2015 19:28. Posts 5459 | | |
| On February 14 2015 15:17 SuFF wrote:
hint: ppl dont bluff that much when 250bb deep
|
And I have to reply to this.
250bb deep are the juiciest tables on stars. People bluff ridiculously and do all kinds of stupid shit.
Basically, what you're saying is the complete opposite of reality.
Just saying. Not trying to be rude. Perhaps we play different stakes (we probably do, since I clearly suck), but that's what I've noticed.
Bigger stacks. Bigger pots. Bigger bluffs. |
|
|
1
|
SuFF   Poland. Feb 14 2015 20:55. Posts 447 | | |
u started by being rude, without adding anything usefull.
I dont see regs bluffing like this 250bbs as standard at any stakes.
Anyway my main point was to not write down what happend in the hand but what it tells you about ur oponent.
I am not a wizard or mind reader so i dont know that they always play deepstack, in that case i still like the note better than #1 post
|
|
|
1
|
devon06atX   Canada. Feb 14 2015 21:11. Posts 5459 | | |
I didn't mean to be rude. It wasn't an attack. Sorry if it came across that way. I'm a blunt person, sometimes it comes off a bit harsh.
Anyways, cheers man. |
|
|
1
|
SuFF   Poland. Feb 14 2015 21:58. Posts 447 | | |
cheers |
|
|
|