Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 1051703 Submitted by : RomichISBACK
PokerStars Zoom Hand #132850275641: Holdem No Limit ($0.05/$0.10) - 2015/03/29 10:23:31 ET
Table Klinkenberg 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: mousefamily ($10.19 in chips)
Seat 2: LucianSSSS ($10.98 in chips)
Seat 3: meda992 ($10 in chips)
Seat 4: N.Zaxariadis ($13.88 in chips)
Seat 5: RomichisBACK ($45.06 in chips)
Seat 6: NAFANNY999 ($44.90 in chips)
LucianSSSS: posts small blind $0.05
meda992: posts big blind $0.10
Holecards(Odds) Dealt to RomichisBACK
N.Zaxariadis: folds
RomichisBACK: raises $0.20 to $0.30
NAFANNY999: calls $0.30
mousefamily: calls $0.30
LucianSSSS: folds
meda992: calls $0.20
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $1.25)
meda992: checks
RomichisBACK: bets $0.83
NAFANNY999: calls $0.83
mousefamily: folds
meda992: folds
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $2.91)
RomichisBACK: bets $2
NAFANNY999: calls $2
River (Pot : $6.91)
RomichisBACK: bets $5.10
NAFANNY999: raises $36.67 to $41.77 and is all-in
RomichisBACK: calls $36.67
Showdown NAFANNY999: shows (a straight, Deuce to Six)
RomichisBACK: shows (three of a kind, Deuces)
NAFANNY999 collected $88.95 from pot
Summary Total pot $90.45 | Rake $1.50
Board
Seat 1: mousefamily (button) folded on the Flop
Seat 2: LucianSSSS (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: meda992 (big blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 4: N.Zaxariadis folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: RomichisBACK showed and lost with three of a kind, Deuces
Seat 6: NAFANNY999 showed and won ($88.95) with a straight, Deuce to Six
|
Comments |
|
1
| 1
|
Nitewin   United States. Mar 29 2015 15:50. Posts 1552 | | |
ya, click f on river. overshove with KT? i dont think so |
|
| 1
|
Noony4096   United Kingdom. Mar 29 2015 16:38. Posts 14 | | |
If villain is a reg, this is a huge leak. People never ever overbet jam (at 10nl zoom), especially for this many chips, since it would not be a profitable enough play, given the fact that people do not realise this is always nuts. If you had kk/10 10 here you could consider a call, but just think about these hands- not sure if you used all timebank but at least think about what beats you. 65 makes some sense especially 65 hh/ 65 ss, and usually at these stakes if a villain reps something they have it given massive imbalance in bluffs (for a good reason) Your also beaten by a slowplayed 33, 10 10, kk which some regs are bad so would play this way. As nitewin said, you almost have a bluffcatcher (!) given the fact that he never value shoves with worse (given reg)
In short, check number of tables he's playing. If he's a fish you can't really fold- if he's a reg this is quite an easy fold.
My analysis obviously in no way applies to any stakes higher than 10nl zoom, but for this stake since people aren't good enough at folding, regs don't need to bluff. Therefore you won't get exploited by making big folds since they don't know if your good enough to fold, and it is too difficult to keep notes on the 3000+ player pool at 10nl zoom |
|
| 1 | |
Thank you for the comment Noony! |
|
| 1
|
traxamillion   United States. Mar 29 2015 22:24. Posts 10468 | | |
Your advice is pretty much right on point noony. Especially about the bluff imbalance.
This guy is racking in 3.5 buyins as a raise on the river. That is not 2 pair. Fold |
|
| 1
|
Trav94   Canada. Mar 30 2015 01:52. Posts 1789 | | |
Spots like this held me back at 5/10NL for so long. Gotta realize he never over jams worse. Gotta stop the "I have a set, never folding ever" thought process and take a second. Time bank and think about what he could have here. Everything Noony said is great. |
|
| Last edit: 30/03/2015 01:53 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|