Thoughts?
My reasoning being I can have tons of flushes here and villain has none (or almost none).

sizing is bad, you would have to turn a lot of ur pairs into a bluff

e: obv hes gonna fold and you can have multiple ranges, but nobody can give answer here unless you specify what hands are you overbet shoving for value etc

I actually like it and I don't think he would have to turn any pairs into bluffs he would have enough with 910 combos and this. Overbet a polarized balanced range and check back a decent bit not sure if there should be another sizing but off top this seems alright to me

T9 = str8

lol I'm blind, ok ur right dogmeat about having to turn pairs into bluffs unless you somehow bet/call turn with bunch of 56/air which you don't. Nobody does

From an exploitative standpoint this makes hero's bluff quite good though. Given hero's line and turn bet/call then this River (worst in deck for villain) he has ton's of strong value hands and very little air/weak hands

On May 06 2015 19:48 traxamillion wrote: lol I'm blind, ok ur right dogmeat about having to turn pairs into bluffs unless you somehow bet/call turn with bunch of 56/air which you don't. Nobody does

56 = str8. jus sayin ;p

ya i agree river sizing is too large, we don't have much air at all. i'd go pot or slightly larger than pot

Agree sizing is bad from GT perspective. However vs the Bovada 1/2 player pool I think this can be very good exploitatively. Finding myself checked to on a river (with 2x psb left) where I have ever single nut flush and villain doesn't have any it seemed like a good spot to apply maximum pressure with my few air hands and all my NF hands.

edit: Actually if K10 is my only bluff for this size that's 15 bluff combos (can't count K10ss obv) vs 9 NF combos. So as long as I am using multiple sizings on this river no need to turn any pairs into overbet bluff.

Man I'm dumb

I like it.