Show hand : 1053451

Handnr: 1053451
Submitted by : HungarianGOD

PokerStars Home Game Hand #134930495696: {HungarianGOD Headsup} Holdem No Limit (5/10) - 2015/05/07 19:30:54 ET
Table Munoz 2-max (Play Money) Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: HungarianGOD (1524 in chips)
Seat 2: gime2per (2412 in chips)
gime2per: posts small blind 5
HungarianGOD: posts big blind 10

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to HungarianGOD
gime2per: raises 20 to 30
HungarianGOD: raises 75 to 105
gime2per: calls 75

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $210.00)

   
HungarianGOD: checks
gime2per: bets 110
HungarianGOD: calls 110

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $430.00)

   
HungarianGOD: checks
gime2per: checks

River (Pot : $430.00)

   
HungarianGOD: checks
gime2per: bets 310
HungarianGOD: calls 310

Showdown
gime2per: shows (two pair, Jacks and Threes)
HungarianGOD: mucks hand
gime2per collected 1003 from pot

Summary
Total pot 1050 | Rake 47
Board  
Seat 1: HungarianGOD (big blind) mucked
Seat 2: gime2per (button) (small blind) showed and won (1003) with two pair, Jacks and Threes

Comments

HungarianGOD   . May 08 2015 07:29. Posts 459 Played another session against that guy. How do you guys feel about this one? I figured a 5 with a backdoor flush/straight draw was OK to put in my checking range. Maybe just take this line and then fold river instead of calling? Should I always be c-betting this flop? I will usually be c-betting when I flop worse than this with connectors, so I'm worried about having a checking range after 3-betting that is too weak (I have most good ace-highs and top set in checking range as well)   Last edit: 08/05/2015 07:37

traxamillion   United States. May 08 2015 08:25. Posts 10468 I personally put this one in the cbet range but don't see a problem with checking

Ryan Neilly   United States. May 08 2015 08:48. Posts 1639 its fine to balance lead here often too

All hands submitted by HungarianGOD: