Reply to hand before clicking this link, here's result: http://www.cardrunners.com/pokertools/session/2921281/replay/

I probably fold read less. I don't think people bluff rivers enough in general. This guy probably checked back 66 or some shit. I have a feeling that he had some stupid bluff though because of the link (which I haven't clicked yet).

meh not folding for that size, he not repping much, i'd guess A4s or something for value.

i assume we are checking to check/shove turn? it's a spot where, with this SPR, i like to overbetjam with a lot of stuff like AsKs and overpairs, and check a polarized range of nuts/air. not sure how that compares to check/jam or bet 2/3, it is a situation i run into soooo often but don't really know if i'm doing it right or not

if its a fish or a reg makes quite a big difference.

the only possible hand your opponent can have is 45s and A4dd that would make any sense at all. That is further reduced by the likeliness that the opponent would sometimes bet the turn with those hands.

I looked at the results before I posted but I already knew I would never fold KK here @ nl 25.

Also as far as traps go, this is a pretty bad board to trap in general, its not likely that you opponent will hero bluff the river when you do trap and secondly its unlikely you opponent will fold a strong but not premium hand when you do bet. So all in all it does not make that much sense to trap.

I would guess a fish is trapping at frequency of maybe 5-10% more then a regular, which I would presume should be close 0%

I dislike turn check. Bet/bet/shove here will yield highest profits longterm vs vast majority of opponents.

I don't like hero's turn check, 3 barrels is highest ev.

If you want to check any street bet the first 2 and c/c river