PokerStars Zoom Hand #139443870855: Holdem No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2015/08/16 11:02:19 CET [2015/08/16 5:02:19 ET]
Table Hydra 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: NataliPS ($30.16 in chips)
Seat 2: One23drumm ($25.10 in chips)
Seat 3: richardliang ($35.71 in chips)
Seat 4: Hero ($26.12 in chips)
Seat 5: Suntribos ($49.44 in chips)
Seat 6: supasizeme ($19.29 in chips)
One23drumm: posts small blind $0.10
richardliang: posts big blind $0.25
Holecards
Dealt to Hero
Hero: raises $0.30 to $0.55
Suntribos: calls $0.55
supasizeme: folds
NataliPS: folds
One23drumm: calls $0.45
richardliang: calls $0.30
Flop (Pot : $2.20)
One23drumm: checks
richardliang: bets $1.05
Hero: calls $1.05
Suntribos: calls $1.05
One23drumm: folds
Turn (Pot : $5.35)
richardliang: checks
Hero: bets $3.88
Suntribos: calls $3.88
richardliang: folds
River (Pot : $13.11)
Hero: bets $8
Suntribos:
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Aug 16 2015 10:11. Posts 15163 | | |
I mean
I have AA, AKdd AKss KTs Sets (Even tho I raise most otf I believe - good approach?)
don't remove draws really as J9s shouldn't be in his range and doubt Richarding leads it anyways
And this being NL25 I assume he will be capped as I assume most regs will raise all sets otf vs 50% size on this board.
So this is like the very best bluffing combo here I will bluff with 100% of the time.
Size is congruent with my AA, AK, KT hands
Would betting a lot bigger since I assume he's capped and he's unknown be better here?
And add other bluffs like even AXss (which I'd give on the river with if I use this sizing for all my range)
|
|
93% Sure! | Last edit: 16/08/2015 10:19 |
|
|
1
|
lucky331   . Aug 16 2015 12:05. Posts 1124 | | |
4 way, I'd not think much of it and avoid any shenanigans on the river. |
|
|
1
|
r0mx0   Slovakia. Aug 16 2015 12:13. Posts 1581 | | |
|
You gotta plow through that shit ! | |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Aug 16 2015 12:16. Posts 15163 | | |
3way
pre's borderline, I'd include it in Zoom most of the time. |
|
93% Sure! | Last edit: 16/08/2015 12:23 |
|
|
1
|
handbanana21   United States. Aug 16 2015 12:50. Posts 3037 | | |
his range is capped to 1pair hands but it could be as strong as akss. if his wtsd and wwsf look low enough you should be bombing riv. |
|
|
1
|
Spitfiree   Bulgaria. Aug 16 2015 13:33. Posts 9634 | | |
| On August 16 2015 11:13 r0mx0 wrote:
too loose pre ? |
nope stnd open thats our bottom range
dunno about the hand feels like we re overbluffing if we do it with this hand but even if we are i think it ll be slightly bad and wouldnt worry too much
banana are u the banana in bet365 ?:D |
|
| Last edit: 16/08/2015 13:38 |
|
|
1
|
Artanis[Xp]   Netherlands. Aug 16 2015 15:10. Posts 4697 | | |
| On August 16 2015 12:33 Spitfiree wrote:
nope stnd open thats our bottom range
dunno about the hand feels like we re overbluffing if we do it with this hand but even if we are i think it ll be slightly bad and wouldnt worry too much
banana are u the banana in bet365 ?:D
|
I don't see how we'd overbluff if we bluff J9d here, it's the absolute worst part of our range and we don't block spades which is good. Definitely the best hand to bluff here. |
|
|
1
|
Spitfiree   Bulgaria. Aug 16 2015 17:43. Posts 9634 | | |
You re probably right I just didn't feel like reviewing the hand through equilab and felt like we got too many flush draws that 3 barrel and QJo type of hands, but on a second view I agree with you |
|
|
1
|
lebowski   Greece. Aug 16 2015 19:19. Posts 9205 | | |
I also think it's too loose from utg to open suited gappers but if nobody is 3betting you non stop or kicking your ass in pos I guess it's fine |
|
new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | |
|
|
1
|
Fayth   Canada. Aug 16 2015 19:31. Posts 10085 | | |
we should probably give up most of our spades hands and bluff this one actually spitfiree |
|
Im not sure what to do tomorrow when I see her, should I shake her hand?? -Floofy | |
|
|
1
|
MARSHALL28   United States. Aug 16 2015 20:37. Posts 1897 | | |
i like a smaller bet on the turn, and a much bigger one on the river ... as much as all in. |
|
|
|