PokerStars Hand #140688627301: Holdem No Limit ($0.08/$0.16 USD) - 2015/09/11 21:58:30 CET [2015/09/11 15:58:30 ET]
Table Welch II 6-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: NinjaStar69 ($17.19 in chips)
Seat 2: coffemonte ($16 in chips)
Seat 3: OkaySherlock ($9.74 in chips)
Seat 4: SnailDrumer ($30.57 in chips)
Seat 5: Hero ($22.14 in chips)
Seat 6: ExDreamerWC3 ($16.12 in chips)
OkaySherlock: posts small blind $0.08
SnailDrumer: posts big blind $0.16
Holecards(Odds) Dealt to Hero
Hero: raises $0.32 to $0.48
ExDreamerWC3: folds
NinjaStar69: folds
coffemonte: folds
OkaySherlock: calls $0.40
SnailDrumer: folds
well... i mean u re almost never winning it but i still wouldnt fold simply because he ll show a bluff once in a decade and we profit
1
MARSHALL28   United States. Sep 11 2015 23:53. Posts 1897
i like your sizing particularly in this spot w/ this hand on flop and turn.
i play the same.
1
traxamillion   United States. Sep 12 2015 09:46. Posts 10468
Check back river if he checks?
1
fira   United States. Sep 12 2015 23:40. Posts 6345
looks good the river sizing is too small to fold to
im actually not a fan of the flop/turn sizings, mainly cause the opponent is short. when we bet that sizing on turn we are basically allin - might as well just go allin. (we bet $3 into $3 with $5.5 behind - not a viable balanced play on this board imo)
1
handbanana21   United States. Sep 13 2015 06:57. Posts 3037
I think if you guys drop the word balance from your poker vocab, your winrates will improve by at least 1-2bb.
1
fira   United States. Sep 13 2015 07:53. Posts 6345
how else would you describe a range that puts makes a bluffcatcher indifferent to calling or folding?
1
traxamillion   United States. Sep 13 2015 16:22. Posts 10468