Aren't we crashed vs diamonds?

edit: diamonds plus something something.

that much already in the pot... can't fold this

Ok. Thanks.

This looks like a pretty clear fold to me.

Getting 2.4 to 1 we need ~42% to call here. We don't even quite have that with what looks like best case scenario so this has to be a fold.

I do not see anything but a fold here

how can we need 42% when it's 3way allin with pot already at $63?

if pot is 0 then we need ~33% (maybe 36% since one guy is a little short) to call...... needing 42% makes no sense at all??

pretty sure we need about 28% or so. am i misreading something here??

On September 14 2015 04:38 4TM wrote: Getting 2.4 to 1 we need ~42% to call here. We don't even quite have that with what looks like best case scenario so this has to be a fold.

don't know where it went wrong, but if we were getting 2,4 to 1 we would need 29,5%.

85/203 = ~0,42
85/(203+85) = 0,295

you need to add our stack to the calculation, otherwise you get such absurd number

This is just a read/stat decision.

I'd fold here almost always against regs. Super high variance move + probably marginally losing call.

If you think you need 42% equity to call here please do not play PLO. You need closer to a quarter

On September 14 2015 16:45 traxamillion wrote: If you think you need 42% equity to call here please do not play PLO. You need closer to a quarter

What has PLO got anything to do with him fucking up pot odds? That would exclude him from all good poker play.

PLR_8648459EC: shows Ah6cTsKc (a full house, Aces full of Aces)


wat

I think in all likelihood this probably is a fold because of the overwhelming majority of the time one of them will have diamonds

I'm just posting these hands for feedback and criticism. I am by no means a PLO expert, so I will probably have some hands with mistakes being made

If we need 26%, someone is gonna have to explain to me how the hell we are gonna get a true 26%, when the FD is out there 99% of the time and when a lot of our outs are mostlikely taken.

you need like 29.5%

On September 14 2015 21:12 careface_ wrote: If we need 26%, someone is gonna have to explain to me how the hell we are gonna get a true 26%, when the FD is out there 99% of the time and when a lot of our outs are mostlikely taken.

first jammer has AA, 2nd has top set. there is a scenario in which u have it

dunno where u are getting that someone is calling flop 100% with a fd; it didn't happen here and some garbage flushdraws with nothing else may have actually folded

Edit: math is hard : (

also is it worth mentioning that there's gonna be a $69 sidepot between us and the 2nd jammer? i'm not sure how this should affect our decision

save the maths for the close spots imo
ez fold

all i have to say is...

Timedawg