bleh
Maybe never bluffing is okay here?
This is like the best draw to 3 barrel with, and it's just 3 combos in my range

EDIT: Actually not even 3, I play mixed strat with this hand pre so like 1.5 so I don't shove this = I never bluff

bigger on flop, otherwise this is fine

FYI what I've done in multiple spots, not just cause of this hand - my play seems good in theory altho exploitively a give up on the river vs unknown is better BvB. I knew and felt it in the hand but shoved anyways because

1. Describe the problem
I dont want to fold and want to choose loose spots where I can win money RIGHT NOW at NL100.
2. Why does your reaction make logical sense
- bigger pots=I've invested a lot in the pot, naturally don't want to fold and leave that to the other dude
- taking a shot I REALLY want to win so naturally I play more aggressively than normal, call when barely don't have odds, to give myself a better chance to win at the limit right now, because not winning pots=having to move down esp. because of cashouts.
3. Why is that logic flawed
it's the same big blinds, similar players, same odds there's no need to play too aggressively or chance my strategy that works.
4. What is the correct way to handle the situation?
I can just play solid, get reads and then open up like I would when playing lower. And definitely be patient in terms of winning at the limit.
5. Why is that correction correct
There's no rush, it's about long run and correct decisions. I don't have to win the hand right now - if I keep working hard and keep taking calculated shots with my solid strategy and off table work I will eventually beat the limit and stay there

this post seems more of a description you needed to clear up for yourself rather than give me info :D
You wont have enough bluffs ever as played I can guarantee it so its a fine line
I told you i dont like the other hands at specific streets

On March 10 2016 20:43 Spitfiree wrote: this post seems more of a description you needed to clear up for yourself rather than give me info :D You wont have enough bluffs ever as played I can guarantee it so its a fine line I told you i dont like the other hands at specific streets

Oh yeah to hell with you that' thing I've written for myself, I don't have a journal on PC :D

I've been doin stupid shit in a lot of spots at 100

OH WAIT
LOOWER ACES DONT CHOP when I have eg AQ and he has AJ
okay I need to stop playing right now. Playing ill wasnt a good idea it seems
easy shove on river -,-

Yea I like this although the K river is kinda bad since it reduces AK combos. Gotta bluff with something here right

lookz fine, only thing is villain prob not foldin a whole lot here (he neva haz a mizzed draw, alwayz zum pair or betta and blankest of blanx on river he prob callin lotz)

i mean explo adjuztment to neva bluff might be lil too much but i'd conzider it here vs dem ztazionz

On March 10 2016 23:35 fira wrote: lookz fine, only thing is villain prob not foldin a whole lot here (he neva haz a mizzed draw, alwayz zum pair or betta and blankest of blanx on river he prob callin lotz) i mean explo adjuztment to neva bluff might be lil too much but i'd conzider it here vs dem ztazionz

This typing hurts my head

Yea fira get it together that shit isn't cute or clever

cygnus sucks at bw