https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international    Contact            Users: 739 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 21:05

Show hand : 1063457

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Back Submit a hand   

Handnr: 1063457
Submitted by : AndrewSong

PokerStars Hand #3251707334: Holdem No Limit ($10/$20) - 2016/03/16 5:02:26
Table #10538718 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: PLR_4761638JM ($2,498 in chips)
Seat 2: PLR_5472139LP ($2,107 in chips)
Seat 3: Hero ($3,425 in chips)
Seat 4: PLR_2427997VA ($2,030 in chips)
Seat 5: PLR_9837451NH ($2,135 in chips)
Seat 6: PLR_5030256PV ($2,436 in chips)
PLR_5472139LP: posts small blind $10
Hero: posts big blind $20

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero 6d6c
PLR_2427997VA: folds
PLR_9837451NH: folds
PLR_5030256PV: folds
PLR_4761638JM: folds
PLR_5472139LP: raises $42 to $52
Hero: calls $32

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $104.00)

   5sKh8c
PLR_5472139LP: bets $34
Hero: calls $34

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $172.00)

   5sKh8c6h
PLR_5472139LP: bets $110
Hero: raises $400 to $400
PLR_5472139LP: calls $290

River (Pot : $972.00)

   5sKh8c6hKd
PLR_5472139LP: checks
Hero: bets $2939.00 and is all-in
PLR_5472139LP: calls $1621.00 and is all-in

Showdown
Hero: shows 6d6c (a full house, Sixs full of Kings)
PLR_5472139LP: shows Kc9d (Three of a kind)
Uncalled bet ($1,318) returned to Hero
Hero collected $4211 from pot

Summary
Total pot $4214 | Rake $3.00
Board  5sKh8c6hKd
Seat 1: PLR_4761638JM (button) showed
Seat 2: PLR_5472139LP (small blind) showed Kc9d
Seat 3: Hero (big blind) showed 6d6c and won ($4211) with a full house, Sixes full of Kings
Seat 4: PLR_2427997VA showed
Seat 5: PLR_9837451NH showed
Seat 6: PLR_5030256PV showed

Also want to share your poker hands? Register an account for free

Comments

Forum Index > pokerhands
handbanana21   United States. Mar 17 2016 22:39. Posts 3037

turn seems like a clear c/c but as played not blocking hearts its prob ok.

Facebook Twitter

fira   United States. Mar 18 2016 04:05. Posts 6345

interesting turn raise... whats ur bluffing range here?


careface_   Canada. Mar 18 2016 07:36. Posts 788

doesnt need a bluffing range on anon games


HungarianGOD   . Mar 18 2016 09:27. Posts 459

That's not how that works. I think in some ways when it's anonymous you want to be as close as possible to unexploitable, because you don't know what peoples tendencies are, so playing exploitatively (ie. not having a bluffing range) is silly. If you don't know how they are bad, shouldn't you just play perfectly?


Although perhaps you are right if the field overall calls to much. Then you can play to exploit the tendencies of the field as a whole and greatly lower your bluff frequency from optimal.

 Last edit: 18/03/2016 09:33

ClouD87   Italy. Mar 18 2016 12:54. Posts 524

If it works, it works. Exploitable or not. Also whether or not you have a bluffing range in spots where no pure bluffs are available is up to you. As long as you have a hand it can always be used as a bluff.

 Last edit: 18/03/2016 12:55

traxamillion   United States. Mar 18 2016 18:45. Posts 10468


  On March 17 2016 21:39 handbanana21 wrote:
turn seems like a clear c/c but as played not blocking hearts its prob ok.



u mean from villain right?

standard hand from a shitty bovada player


 

All hands submitted by AndrewSong:






Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2024. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap