|
|
 |
Show hand : 1077422 |
 |
Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 1077422
Submitted by : wobbly_au
PokerStars Hand #69438719838: Holdem No Limit ($200/$400 USD) - 2011/10/24 3:07:41 ET
Table Wabash II 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: thecortster ($49786 in chips)
Seat 2: wobbly_au ($57389 in chips)
Seat 3: nutsinho ($103795 in chips)
Seat 4: takechip ($176512 in chips)
Seat 5: LiangYu ($123685 in chips)
Seat 6: PokrCroaker ($34020 in chips)
wobbly_au: posts small blind $200
nutsinho: posts big blind $400
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to wobbly_au  
takechip: raises $400 to $800
LiangYu: calls $800
PokrCroaker: folds
thecortster: calls $800
wobbly_au: raises $5200 to $6000
nutsinho: folds
takechip: folds
LiangYu: raises $74800 to $80800
thecortster: folds
wobbly_au: calls $51389 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($23411) returned to LiangYu
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $116,778.00)
  
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $116,778.00)
River (Pot : $116,778.00)
Showdown
wobbly_au: shows (high card Ace)
LiangYu: shows   (a pair of Threes)
LiangYu collected $116773 from pot
Summary
Total pot $116778 | Rake $5
Board
Seat 1: thecortster (button) folded before Flop
Seat 2: wobbly_au (small blind) showed and lost with high card Ace
Seat 3: nutsinho (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: takechip folded before Flop
Seat 5: LiangYu showed and won ($116773) with a pair of Threes
Seat 6: PokrCroaker folded before Flop (didnt bet)
 |
Comments |
 |
1
 |
wobbly_au Australia. Sep 30 2017 09:45. Posts 6540 | | |
one of the bigger ones i found.
Whats the worst hand I cal with here? |
| |
|
| 1
|
wobbly_au Australia. Sep 30 2017 09:56. Posts 6540 | | |
Given we know there is 33 his range is probably
22-66 Some AA, KK AK, AQ, AJ and maybe some T9s types? |
|
| The Last Laugh. | Last edit: 30/09/2017 09:56 |
|
| 1
 |
Stroggoz New Zealand. Sep 30 2017 10:01. Posts 5330 | | |
lol probably any of those hands except T9s. |
|
| One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beings | |
|
| 1
|
wobbly_au Australia. Sep 30 2017 10:03. Posts 6540 | | |
I actually meant that seems like his shoving range. |
| |
|
| 4
 |
Baalim Mexico. Sep 30 2017 10:10. Posts 34262 | | |
fish dont play ranges I mean, they dont shove PPs 100% sometimes they call so I think it would be a big mistake to assume his range is 22+ T9+
What you are trying to calculate is the maximium exploitation to certain range, but I think its just bad trying to define his range too precisely and we could be making awful calls based on wild assumptions.
Since you squeezed pretty big to 15bb against an UTG open from a competent player I assume your range is pretty strong here If you define that range you will realize that probably your avg hand will be AQ strenght wise so you can easily let go your weaker hands and you wouldnt be folding much at all |
|
| Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
| 1
|
wobbly_au Australia. Sep 30 2017 10:32. Posts 6540 | | |
ofcourse fish play ranges.. they are just less balanced.. I mean that as in he doesnt always have 33 here, which means he has a range!
But I think AK, JJ+ is suitable to call. maybe not JJ since i was shot taking. |
|
| The Last Laugh. | Last edit: 30/09/2017 10:49 |
|
| 4
|
Baalim Mexico. Sep 30 2017 22:35. Posts 34262 | | |
well duh I didnt mean literally they dont play ranges, what I mean is they play erratically therefore they have very erratic ranges, so trying to put them in a thing like 22+ or something like that will lead to bad conclusions |
|
| Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
| 1
|
wobbly_au Australia. Oct 01 2017 05:23. Posts 6540 | | |
at the time i put him on exactly all pairs under 66s hehe |
| |
|
| |
|
|
 Poker Streams | |
|
Contact Users: 1086 Active, 1 Logged in - Time: 08:32
