awkkkkkkkkkward

how bout 23.77 or 52.44, i think your sizing actually is quite transparent in this one sir.

i'd fold AQ and AK, Tx is strong enough to call, rest is a fold... i like to toy my sizigs for crying call in these spots when im so nutted when i x/r, or go huge and pray they call.

sizings standard and fine, i think in this day and age, we should be balancing more smaller bet and bigger bets, and using these betsizings as more of our river bluff lines vs bad regs. (ie if you floated KQdd, led turn, and x/r river here, would be a stronger candidate for a river sizing like this

lets get this forum going again, ill get some hands on here too, been playin mostly on untracked sites

I dont understand turn lead vs players without strong bluffing tendancy, espesially along with the river check.

Ya, also don't really get this hand. What's PIO say about turn/river?

lol pio leads turn 97% if villian never raises turn lead, but it leads 1% if they do.

https://gyazo.com/c37ebe9d445f8822f4c4c14ada1fd99d
https://gyazo.com/535d7fd925b47f6126aa7bb83d361ee2

im fine with c/r, c/c and leading flop, as i played it i wanted to lead turn with a small sizing so i can include floats like QJs, KJs, KQs, and get value from Ax that check back too often. River i need to check some hands so i don't get owned with Qx. I will most likely lead river with some Qx and Tx, KJ, and check river with AT, Ax, Qx.

https://gyazo.com/5f9dad5c142f7f5804d5c0d9d00a0d5c
https://gyazo.com/7c213296b0669242a8aec6dc9ff73e0d
https://gyazo.com/851d782be95a1898be5eabeb25846b6b
https://gyazo.com/e26a27d052594b95c5be6fa0eb49c895

pio doesn't like leading turn at all, since it makes IP raise the lead 33%. (with hands like AQ+),

in both scenarios it prefers checking river with AT but its mixed

interesting drastic change of strat, it never leads turn :o but CR it a lot

in general people play far from gto leading ranges, so it might be a profitable research project to see how you can exploit that .

are you guys talking about changes vs someone that doesnt raise turn donkbet ?
this is very standard, whenever villain doesnt raise a spot, your bet frequency is going to be huge
that why we see a lot of bet/3bet/stack off on high stakes lately

if you xr flop and someone doesnt have a 3bet range, your xr frequency is also going to be huge, this is for all spots

On October 12 2017 02:57 Stroggoz wrote: lol pio leads turn 97% if villian never raises turn lead, but it leads 1% if they do. https://gyazo.com/c37ebe9d445f8822f4c4c14ada1fd99d https://gyazo.com/535d7fd925b47f6126aa7bb83d361ee2 im fine with c/r, c/c and leading flop, as i played it i wanted to lead turn with a small sizing so i can include floats like QJs, KJs, KQs, and get value from Ax that check back too often. River i need to check some hands so i don't get owned with Qx. I will most likely lead river with some Qx and Tx, KJ, and check river with AT, Ax, Qx.

Why would pio's line depend on villain's future action that way? Shouldn't it be looking at all possibly lines of the tree and finding the optimal line from that?

Or are you fixing certain actions to see the response?

^I ran two sims, one with raise vs lead and one without.

don't bother running sims without raise size, it's pretty dumb, only players I could see NEVER raising vs a small turn lead would be some sort of whale and well we don't need to balance vs those