I got general ranges for preflop spot for bvb in games where rake allows for limping strategy.

Sb strategy is very mixed. some thoughts looking at it was damn, hard to implement in real time. another thing to note is that in live poker with time rake structure the limping strategy should be used, which is interesting because sb side is not easy. bb here is very capped when he checks preflop.

edit : was commenting on flop but not sure why linus 3b flop here.

have you got pio edge? i need to work on my preflop and blind vs blind quite a bit. I've mainly been studying button vs bb and 3bet pots.

yeah the reason it's so mixed is to gain the tiniest unexploitability in things like card removal that you could only figure out how to exploit if you played someone for 1 million hands. you should mix but not to the extreme degree that solvers come up with.

nah not right now, maybe down the line.

right now i just have their 6max pack, which doesnt break down every position vs position. essentially it has general solutions for blind vs blind, and VPIP vs bigblind spots (so no spots where preflop opens and IP caller, ex CO vs BU). its better on the blind vs blind i think...pretty solid, accounts for various rakes, etc. for vs bb it basically breaks it down into vpip/preflop sizing vs bigblind. it's kinda clumsy in it's preflop hands selections for the vpip vs bb stuff (goes by like 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 55vpip, etc). their selections in these vpip buckets are static and since it's solved for postflop you can't change the preflop hands or anything. also you have a baseline subset of flops that it's solved for. if you want to customize towards a specific flop you either have to compare it to a similar flop or you can just copy ranges to clipboard and rerun the sim yourself. its not bad for right now though / saves some time.