I don't understand much about this hand. Are you calling flop to c/raise most turns? Also, If the river was a brick or a high card would you x/shove too? Or is this hand played like this because you had reads on the dude?

near the bottom of our calling range, but if we are checking 100% its a call. Most villains ace and king highs are checking back right? So on this texture our hand is still ahead quite a bit vs a bet.

On August 13 2018 21:52 handbanana21 wrote: near the bottom of our calling range, but if we are checking 100% its a call. Most villains ace and king highs are checking back right? So on this texture our hand is still ahead quite a bit vs a bet.

unless you have a very specific read on his cbet strat that is a wild guess

well isnt that what we do? We have to make assumptions based on limited info. Snowie and gto+ both say to call this combo vs this sizing, so it cant be too far off.

flop x/c seems somewhat standard, probably neutral ev. turn x/r seems standard.

The river looks standard. Could also take the block betting route. Nice bluff though perhaps x/r is better than the block here, i can't be sure. Perhaps pio mixes checks and blocks on river at a reasonable frequency.

PIO:

flop and turn is standard vs his sizeings, it ch/calls all the BDFD Q6s vs 30% size. Turn vs halfpot it ch/raises about 40% of Q6s and folds the rest.

On the river it differs from my line alot, seems to like to just continue betting alot, when checking it dosnt ch/raise Q6

https://gyazo.com/72c470e209addd6718beeae8ef749339

On August 14 2018 01:25 handbanana21 wrote: well isnt that what we do? We have to make assumptions based on limited info. Snowie and gto+ both say to call this combo vs this sizing, so it cant be too far off.

in part, but mostly you should build your strat regardless of what they do and then adjust on field tendencies and then adjust even further with specific reads, do you have any data that supports your notion? if not, that is what I call a wild guess

On August 15 2018 04:17 Baalim wrote: Show nested quote + On August 14 2018 01:25 handbanana21 wrote: well isnt that what we do? We have to make assumptions based on limited info. Snowie and gto+ both say to call this combo vs this sizing, so it cant be too far off. in part, but mostly you should build your strat regardless of what they do and then adjust on field tendencies and then adjust even further with specific reads, do you have any data that supports your notion? if not, that is what I call a wild guess

The data disagrees with me. Its betting mostly all kx and ax. Good call bud.