I'd x/raise the flop everytime, you got lucky he bet the turn which he shouldn't have. If you x/raise you win more assuming he shouldn't be calling the river.

Lose next to nothing in terms of EV by not having a raising range on this flop. Good as played imo.

We do have all AQo in our range so it shouldn't be an issue to develop a raising range here I'm not sure how much equity we lose by not having a CR range but that will probably allow him to Cbet 100% and this isn't a board that is easy to defend for us in the BB against that frequency, sounds like a much more harder thing to do than to simply having a CR range

My ranges must be pretty far off here. We really have all AQo and no 66?

who said we wouldn't have any 66 here? defending BB is ok with 66; not like you should always 3b it

Baal before he edited his post

You won't have enough hands in your check call check turn line if you always check raise AQ and 66 on this flop. His range contains more AA QQ and AQ hands that you need to put a few stronger hands in your turn check lines to defend against really aggressive plays. Also his turn bet size was also too weak.

I think pio has like 60% combos of 66 flat pre (or something like that)
and about the same with AQ?
(assuming villain's not a nit)

On December 20 2018 19:26 4TM wrote: Baal before he edited his post

missread the hand and edited

On December 21 2018 01:19 Baalim wrote: Show nested quote + On December 20 2018 19:26 4TM wrote: Baal before he edited his post missread the hand and edited

In your original post (iirc) you said Hero should have no 66 and all AQo. The misread that makes the most sense to me is that you thought it was BBvBU. If I am right in that assumption are you saying AQo is a 100% flat BBvBU? Or was the misread one spot the other way and you were saying 66 is 100% 3bet and AQo is 100% flat BBvMP.

Now that I got my pathetic jab in I have an actual question.

I started using Snowie before Pio. When I bought Pio I continued to use preflop ranges taken from Snowie when running sims in Pio. It would seem there is a significant difference between the two sets of preflop ranges. I am of the belief that in practice, as long as they aren't way off base, preflop ranges are far less important than knowing what your range is and how to play it on various textures/runouts. Is Snowie trash? Am I making a big mistake building my strategy in this way?

I built most of my pio preflop ranges by hand using a large 25/50+ stars hand sample using positional stats and showdown info. It was an insane amount of work getting each different spot for 6max so I ended up supplementing it with pio preflop solves.

I can't speak for snowie but I suspect those ranges aren't optimal because they would be built backwards from snowie's own solutions and from what I have seen those differ quite a bit from pio.

On December 21 2018 03:03 4TM wrote: Show nested quote + On December 21 2018 01:19 Baalim wrote:   On December 20 2018 19:26 4TM wrote: Baal before he edited his post missread the hand and edited In your original post (iirc) you said Hero should have no 66 and all AQo. The misread that makes the most sense to me is that you thought it was BBvBU. If I am right in that assumption are you saying AQo is a 100% flat BBvBU? Or was the misread one spot the other way and you were saying 66 is 100% 3bet and AQo is 100% flat BBvMP. Now that I got my pathetic jab in I have an actual question. I started using Snowie before Pio. When I bought Pio I continued to use preflop ranges taken from Snowie when running sims in Pio. It would seem there is a significant difference between the two sets of preflop ranges. I am of the belief that in practice, as long as they aren't way off base, preflop ranges are far less important than knowing what your range is and how to play it on various textures/runouts. Is Snowie trash? Am I making a big mistake building my strategy in this way?

'

I thought we had QQ not 66