Show hand : 1087002

Handnr: 1087002
Submitted by : Stroggoz

PokerStars Zoom Hand #203665377366: Holdem No Limit ($2.50/$5.00) - 2019/08/26 14:25:50 ET
Table Lambda Velorum 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: MissOracle ($558.44 in chips)
Seat 2: Saquird ($500 in chips)
Seat 3: Stroggos_nz ($1117.25 in chips)
Seat 4: kingTclubs ($929.51 in chips)
Seat 5: 4elMedSvin ($610.84 in chips)
Seat 6: skow73 ($890.03 in chips)
Saquird: posts small blind $2.50
Stroggos_nz: posts big blind $5

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Stroggos_nz
kingTclubs: folds
4elMedSvin: folds
skow73: folds
MissOracle: folds
Saquird: raises $10 to $15
Stroggos_nz: calls $10

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $30.00)

   
Saquird: bets $9.41
Stroggos_nz: calls $9.41

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $48.82)

   
Saquird: bets $66.79
Stroggos_nz: calls $66.79

River (Pot : $182.40)

   
Saquird: bets $408.80 and is all-in
Stroggos_nz: calls $408.80

Showdown
Saquird: shows (high card Queen)
Stroggos_nz: shows (a pair of Jacks)
Stroggos_nz collected $997 from pot

Summary
Total pot $1000 | Rake $3
Board  
Seat 1: MissOracle (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 2: Saquird (small blind) showed and lost with high card Queen
Seat 3: Stroggos_nz (big blind) showed and won ($997) with a pair of Jacks
Seat 4: kingTclubs folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: 4elMedSvin folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: skow73 folded before Flop (didnt bet)

Comments

casinocasino   Canada. Aug 26 2019 21:44. Posts 3346 Nice call

Spitfiree   Bulgaria. Aug 26 2019 22:47. Posts 9634 thats pretty sick, but isnt his range much stronger

Stroggoz   New Zealand. Aug 26 2019 23:04. Posts 5329 Both solver and his range are significantly stronger than mine by the river, that doesn't mean this isn't an ok call, without info. These spots are where you have to abandon the solver to a large extent and start asking questions like how would they split their sizings on river here. For example does he bet QT with an overbet jam sizing here? does he bet 1/3 size with hands like Q9? and how would he assort his bluffs to each sizing if so, this would be a complex strategy that's difficult to balance, and we can try to play exploitative poker if we think we know enough. One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beings

lebowski   Greece. Aug 27 2019 01:58. Posts 9205   On August 26 2019 21:47 Spitfiree wrote: thats pretty sick new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man...

balakubak   . Aug 27 2019 04:01. Posts 152   On August 26 2019 22:04 Stroggoz wrote: Both solver and his range are significantly stronger than mine by the river, that doesn't mean this isn't an ok call, without info. These spots are where you have to abandon the solver to a large extent and start asking questions like how would they split their sizings on river here. For example does he bet QT with an overbet jam sizing here? does he bet 1/3 size with hands like Q9? and how would he assort his bluffs to each sizing if so, this would be a complex strategy that's difficult to balance, and we can try to play exploitative poker if we think we know enough. Does that mean you could find a fold if he bet 2/3 - 3/4 pot?

All hands submitted by Stroggoz: