Show hand : 1091035

Handnr: 1091035
Submitted by : Stroggoz

PokerStars Zoom Hand #210775540393: Holdem No Limit ($2.50/$5.00) - 2020/03/27 6:36:22 ET
Table Lambda Velorum 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: skow73 ($583.84 in chips)
Seat 2: Ohljo ($1763.41 in chips)
Seat 3: Stroggos_nz ($623.79 in chips)
Seat 4: nutsrandom ($524.87 in chips)
Seat 5: mynameiskarl ($763.34 in chips)
Ohljo: posts small blind $2.50
Stroggos_nz: posts big blind $5

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Stroggos_nz
nutsrandom: raises $7.50 to $12.50
mynameiskarl: folds
skow73: folds
Ohljo: folds
Stroggos_nz: calls $7.50

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $27.50)

   
Stroggos_nz: checks
nutsrandom: checks

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $27.50)

   
Stroggos_nz: checks
nutsrandom: checks

River (Pot : $27.50)

   
Stroggos_nz: checks
nutsrandom: bets $20.90
Stroggos_nz: raises $101.88 to $122.78
nutsrandom: calls $101.88

Showdown
Stroggos_nz: shows (three of a kind, Fives)
nutsrandom: shows (three of a kind, Jacks)
nutsrandom collected $270.06 from pot

Summary
Total pot $273.06 | Rake $3
Board  
Seat 1: skow73 (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 2: Ohljo (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: Stroggos_nz (big blind) showed and lost with three of a kind, Fives
Seat 4: nutsrandom showed and won ($270.06) with three of a kind, Jacks
Seat 5: mynameiskarl folded before Flop (didnt bet)

Comments

Nitewin   United States. Mar 27 2020 12:58. Posts 1552 he played it fine, no? you could have QT too

Ryan Neilly   United States. Mar 28 2020 09:57. Posts 1639 he should be betting this flop 25-40% imo....... JJ saved alot here..

Trav94   Canada. Mar 28 2020 13:45. Posts 1789   On March 28 2020 08:57 Ryan Neilly wrote: he should be betting this flop 25-40% imo....... JJ saved alot here.. Even if he should be cbetting this board with range, JJ plays better as a check I think. I don't see the issue with deviating from that in villains spot.   Last edit: 28/03/2020 13:45

ToT)MidiaN(    United Kingdom. Mar 28 2020 16:40. Posts 5070 The sim I run using PIO 500zoom ranges does not have IP cbetting close to 100% overall. In fact, only about half the time overall and JJ is mostly a check. One day good. One day bad. And some days, even hope

Stroggoz   New Zealand. Mar 28 2020 18:28. Posts 5329 it's not a fantastic board for UTG, the low cards and their connectivity are the reason for having a high check range. what i wanted to know was what the sim though of river call. One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beings

ToT)MidiaN(    United Kingdom. Mar 28 2020 18:43. Posts 5070 Ran river - JJ is just flatting. I'm more curious about the turn. After the flop checks through the BB is checking 89% of the time, betting 3/4ths 3% and 1.5x pot 8%. If the board is largely good for the BB, how come it's so passive on the turn? After being so passive on turn it's also pretty passive on river, checking 66% of the time. It favours a small sizing on the river when it does bet. Ran the sim with 1/4th, 3/4ths and 1.5x pot options on all 3 streets if that helps. One day good. One day bad. And some days, even hope Last edit: 28/03/2020 18:44

Baalim   Mexico. Mar 30 2020 06:42. Posts 34262 because a 9 turn isnt great for the BB range Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online

All hands submitted by Stroggoz: