flyingshark7: checks
Stroggos_nz: bets $340.61 and is all-in
flyingshark7: calls $340.61
Showdown Stroggos_nz: shows (high card Ace)
flyingshark7: shows (a pair of Kings)
flyingshark7 collected $1273.92 from pot
Summary Total pot $1276.92 | Rake $3
Board
Seat 1: Stroggos_nz (button) showed and lost with high card Ace
Seat 2: flyingshark7 (small blind) showed and won ($1273.92) with a pair of Kings
Seat 3: alphazulu689 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: Servasx folded before Flop
Seat 5: monkaSSSS folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: jimmybeam045 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Nitewin   United States. Apr 20 2020 02:22. Posts 1552
So dangerous to play against you. Hard to even see what bluffs you have here. I like it. Against a nit like me I'd probably fold.
1
Stroggoz   New Zealand. Apr 20 2020 03:19. Posts 5329
heh, one of my worst bluffs of the day perhaps? I just don't see people folding enough on Q river. I don't need to bluff here just because its the bottom of my range, that is illogical nonsense imo.
One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beings
1
Nitewin   United States. Apr 20 2020 17:00. Posts 1552
I'm assuming your flatting range consists of high PP's and the occasional suited connector.
Turn is rainbow so no flush draws.
The obligated small flop bet call with 9Ts with bd draws would have hit.
45s probably doesn't make that play pre. If so, a very small % of the time.
SB cold 4 bet is too strong to be messing with A3s type hand.
JJ, QQ makes set.
Slowplayed AA beats KK.
99-TT probably doesn't need to bluff river.
KJ, KQs can check back too.
for 100bbs he's supposed to have some percentage of all pps that he 3bet (down to 22), even small percentages of A5s type hands, not sure if ppl do that irl or how stack depth changes that
new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man...
1
Nitewin   United States. Apr 21 2020 01:42. Posts 1552
Isn't it the opposite? For 100 bb's you shouldn't have that but deeper those type of hands increase in value.