mind you this is REALLY deep in a tournament 40/2600 like WTF is this

wait is this foldable? hmm...

Yes, pretty sure he isn’t bluffing too much of the time unless u have a read, I can let it go, jack is the worst card. 89 jt gets there

On July 26 2021 07:21 lostaccount wrote: Yes, pretty sure he isn’t bluffing too much of the time unless u have a read, I can let it go, jack is the worst card. 89 jt gets there

GTO says it's pure call and not even remotely close, however vs. population it might differ and I'd be open for that discussion. But dude honestly your comments/analysis (this and others before) are rudimentary and also contains inaccuracies. He's shoving worse for value on this turn so Jc is definitely not the worst card (which would be a 7). Also you make it sound like an easy spot where in reality ranges are really wide and it just kind of shows that you don't have a very good grasp of MTTs. So please don't comment more on any of my hands cause it's annoying.

On July 26 2021 15:00 Gumster wrote: Show nested quote + On July 26 2021 07:21 lostaccount wrote: Yes, pretty sure he isn’t bluffing too much of the time unless u have a read, I can let it go, jack is the worst card. 89 jt gets there GTO says it's pure call and not even remotely close, however vs. population it might differ and I'd be open for that discussion. But dude honestly your comments/analysis (this and others before) are rudimentary and also contains inaccuracies. He's shoving worse for value on this turn so Jc is definitely not the worst card (which would be a 7). Also you make it sound like an easy spot where in reality ranges are really wide and it just kind of shows that you don't have a very good grasp of MTTs. So please don't comment more on any of my hands cause it's annoying.

alright enough said, if he is shoving worst than QQ on this hand its a read, gonna hard to give accurate info on a guy if u have no reads. personally i wouldnt jam without 2p+ here but w/e ill stop commenting.

sorry if that came off as harsh but it's when you make it sound like easy spots which tilts me, along with this fucking killer downswing

I think solvers cant account for how deep we are in a tournament either right?
Also, why are we using the bigger sizing on this flop..? I would've thought this is a smaller sizing situation. Whats the idea/thought process behind this one?

On July 27 2021 05:17 gawdawaful wrote: I think solvers cant account for how deep we are in a tournament either right? Also, why are we using the bigger sizing on this flop..? I would've thought this is a smaller sizing situation. Whats the idea/thought process behind this one?

Because opponent is defending a lot of weak shit (3x, 7x and Tx) and we have a pretty significant range advantage. CO can have all sets but BB cant have TT. CO has all overpairs and BB has none. We're simply crushing his range and want to extract value from when he has hit a pair. We can probably bet big with almost entire range here

any J/Q/K/A is awesome for our range and trash for BB so we can continue bombing profitably and BB's life will be miserable with 7x and even Tx

I don't hate the play, maybe a turn fold vs a bunch of opponents.... but I think I prefer a turn check here actually.
I am sure it would be mixed for me, though.

On July 27 2021 09:34 Gumster wrote: Show nested quote + On July 27 2021 05:17 gawdawaful wrote: I think solvers cant account for how deep we are in a tournament either right? Also, why are we using the bigger sizing on this flop..? I would've thought this is a smaller sizing situation. Whats the idea/thought process behind this one? Because opponent is defending a lot of weak shit (3x, 7x and Tx) and we have a pretty significant range advantage. CO can have all sets but BB cant have TT. CO has all overpairs and BB has none. We're simply crushing his range and want to extract value from when he has hit a pair. We can probably bet big with almost entire range here

Literally everything you said here is reason for me to bet smaller to force continues with a wider variety of shit, induce some x/r with J9/J8 types. I think betting bigger I think deters that.

On July 28 2021 03:17 gawdawaful wrote: Show nested quote + On July 27 2021 09:34 Gumster wrote:   On July 27 2021 05:17 gawdawaful wrote: I think solvers cant account for how deep we are in a tournament either right? Also, why are we using the bigger sizing on this flop..? I would've thought this is a smaller sizing situation. Whats the idea/thought process behind this one? Because opponent is defending a lot of weak shit (3x, 7x and Tx) and we have a pretty significant range advantage. CO can have all sets but BB cant have TT. CO has all overpairs and BB has none. We're simply crushing his range and want to extract value from when he has hit a pair. We can probably bet big with almost entire range here Literally everything you said here is reason for me to bet smaller to force continues with a wider variety of shit, induce some x/r with J9/J8 types. I think betting bigger I think deters that.

I dont see many people c/ring this type of board, possibly very aggressive opponents but population practically never. Also you want to build the pot when youre ahead and they cant fold 7x or even 3x against a 52% bet cuz then they will be massively overfolding so I think my logic is sound

On July 27 2021 20:56 asdf2000 wrote: I don't hate the play, maybe a turn fold vs a bunch of opponents.... but I think I prefer a turn check here actually. I am sure it would be mixed for me, though.

I think my biggest leak is just adapting to population tendencies and I get stuck in GTO land where this is a slam dunk bet/call.....

I mean if you're not betting the smaller size with this hand, what hands are you betting the smaller size with?

Plus based on what you just said, that is a blanket argument for betting 52% with all the best parts of your range (lets say, top pair and better) and that just can't be right.

I mean one argument for a bigger size here is we unblock all the top pair hands, but even still, that should be a very small part of their range and imo we should be more focused on what continues for 33% and not 52%

Your sizing seems too big post flop. with smaller sizing we can fold pretty comfortably on turn esp holding Qc. As played seems pretty tough to fold with this much invested.