Show hand : 11080

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!

Handnr: 11080
Submitted by : Daut

PokerStars Game #4037283483: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2006/02/20 - 10:41:53 (ET)
Table 'May' Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: Daut44 ($232.65 in chips)
Seat 2: 1BoredFarmer ($40.60 in chips)
Seat 3: THETOOL76 ($30.05 in chips)
Seat 6: hans04 ($58.50 in chips)
THETOOL76: posts small blind $0.50
hans04: posts big blind $1

Holecards
Dealt to Daut44
Daut44: raises $3 to $4
1BoredFarmer: calls $4
THETOOL76: folds
hans04: folds

Flop (Pot : $9.5)


Daut44: bets $5
1BoredFarmer: calls $5

Turn (Pot : $19.5)


Daut44: bets $11
1BoredFarmer: calls $11

River (Pot : $41.5)


Daut44: bets $21
1BoredFarmer: folds
Daut44 collected $39.50 from pot
Daut44: doesn't show hand

Summary
Total pot $41.50 | Rake $2
Board
Seat 1: Daut44 collected ($39.50)
Seat 2: 1BoredFarmer (button) folded on the River
Seat 3: THETOOL76 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: hans04 (big blind) folded before Flop

Also want to share your poker hands? Register an account for free

Comments

Forum Index > pokerhands

Daut

United States. Feb 20 2006 08:48. Posts 8955

check call river?
i guess if im going to put him all in i might as well try and induce a bluff from a worse hand?

NewbSaibot: 18 TIMES THE SPEED OF LIGHT. Because FUCK YOU, Daut

Ket

United Kingdom. Feb 20 2006 08:51. Posts 8665

i think it's fine. any pair calls, the .5/1 shortstacks have huge callranges for river allins of their remaining stack. besides, they'll check behind with a missed draw a lot of the time. i would guess the putting them allin is more +ev from my experience with typical .5/1 6max shortstacks at PS

All hands submitted by Daut: