Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 1238 Submitted by : WhyYouKickMyDog
PokerStars Game #3242177012: Tournament #15323030, Hold'em No Limit - Level X (400/800) - 2005/12/04 - 19:10:56 (ET)
Table '15323030 202' Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: wired_c4 (26900 in chips)
Seat 2: Infitilt (16607 in chips)
Seat 3: Dudley33 (31488 in chips)
Seat 4: pjh1243 (38706 in chips)
Seat 5: abel (14709 in chips)
Seat 6: robert213 (147 in chips)
Seat 7: mecanic tg (10620 in chips)
Seat 8: rickstere25 (6939 in chips)
Seat 9: Reddog133 (723 in chips)
wired_c4: posts the ante 50
Infitilt: posts the ante 50
Dudley33: posts the ante 50
pjh1243: posts the ante 50
abel: posts the ante 50
robert213: posts the ante 50
mecanic tg: posts the ante 50
rickstere25: posts the ante 50
Reddog133: posts the ante 50
Infitilt: posts small blind 400
Dudley33: posts big blind 800
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to wired_c4 ]
pjh1243: folds
abel: folds
robert213: calls 97 and is all-in
mecanic tg: folds
rickstere25: folds
Reddog133: folds
wired_c4: raises 1600 to 2400
Infitilt: folds
Dudley33: calls 1600
*** FLOP *** ]
Dudley33: bets 3200
wired_c4: calls 3200
*** TURN *** ]
Dudley33: checks
wired_c4: bets 7200
Infitilt is sitting out
Dudley33: calls 7200
*** RIVER *** ]
Dudley33: checks
wired_c4: bets 4000
Dudley33: calls 4000
*** SHOW DOWN ***
wired_c4: shows ] (three of a kind, Sevens)
Reddog133 said, "not as bad as the obv tilt push from the button with K8"
Dudley33: mucks hand
wired_c4 collected 33709 from side pot
robert213: mucks hand
wired_c4 collected 838 from main pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 34547 Main pot 838. Side pot 33709. | Rake 0
Board ]
Seat 1: wired_c4 (button) showed ] and won (34547) with three of a kind, Sevens
Seat 2: Infitilt (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: Dudley33 (big blind) mucked ]
Seat 4: pjh1243 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: abel folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: robert213 mucked ]
Seat 7: mecanic tg folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: rickstere25 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: Reddog133 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
|
Comments |
|
1
|
iakim322   United States. Dec 04 2005 17:38. Posts 1335 | | |
hey kickdog. remember vcr~mofo from bw? coz that was me and i remember you. zerg player. just saying what's up. didn't know you played this degenerate game we call poker too.
by the way nicely played. although you were helped tremendously by that monkey. |
|
| 4
|
Daut   United States. Dec 04 2005 17:39. Posts 8955 | | |
lol at that bet on the end.
just check behind if youre going to bet that much. 5 bb at this level wont give you enough more chips in upcoming levels to justify the risk of him check raising on the end. |
|
NewbSaibot: 18 TIMES THE SPEED OF LIGHT. Because FUCK YOU, Daut | |
|
| 1
|
fira   United States. Dec 04 2005 17:40. Posts 6345 | | |
yeah i'd just check the river
because usually, when they have you beat they'll raise, and when they don't, they'll fold. |
|
| Last edit: 04/12/2005 17:41 |
|
| 1
|
iakim322   United States. Dec 04 2005 17:40. Posts 1335 | | |
i would have just put all in. |
|
| 1
|
iakim322   United States. Dec 04 2005 17:44. Posts 1335 | | |
after a delay of 'thinking.' |
|
| 1 | |
bigballs i think 4k in chips is plenty worth the risk of the checkraise, which would only be another 10k. i SERIOUSLY doubted he would check to me if he hit the straight. I put him on an 8, and i thought hed call 4k with an 8, and not a push. |
|
| 1
|
TwistedEcho   United Kingdom. Dec 04 2005 17:55. Posts 3539 | | |
i think i push this river. He almost never has you beat. |
|
|
| 1
|
TwistedEcho   United Kingdom. Dec 04 2005 17:56. Posts 3539 | | |
I expect to be good 95% of the times on this river |
|
|
| 1 | |
ya. if i was in this situation again, id push. if he thinks im bluffing, he thinks im bluffing, and hes calling with his A6 or A8 or whatever pair hes got
but im pushing instead of 4k for value, and DEFINITELY not because im scared of a checkraise or anything. thats just ridiculous to be scared of a c/r here.
wish i could think these through well enough in the time given... these little mistakes are gonna cost me |
|
| 4
|
Daut   United States. Dec 04 2005 19:29. Posts 8955 | | |
4k is such a horrible bet. it's damaging to your image, incurs extra risk, and is not worth it. the blinds will surely rise soon after this, so you are risking your tournament life for an extra 2.5 big blinds in 5 minutes? Not worth it at all. |
|
NewbSaibot: 18 TIMES THE SPEED OF LIGHT. Because FUCK YOU, Daut | |
|
| 1
|
iakim322   United States. Dec 04 2005 19:56. Posts 1335 | | |
he's not 'risking' his tournament. he is saying he's 100% confident in his read that he's ahead and he wants to bet the amount that he thinks will be called. |
|
| 1
|
tontonba   . Dec 05 2005 01:16. Posts 1281 | | |
the value for a set of 7's at that point should be the remainder of his or his opponent's stack... not that pussy ass 4k bet. have some balls and push. |
|
|
| 1 | |
yep shoulda pushed. but seriously, bigballs, you are 100% correct that 4k was a shitty bet. but you have the worst possible reasoning behind thinking that. it incurs ZERO extra risk, it IS worth it, etc etc. the main reason my play was wrong, is that its more profitable to push since he will call that almost as often as the 4k bet. also, good point about it hurting my image. but the rest of your reasoning...
just wondering... from all your posts ive read, you seem to analyze every poker hand as if it was played in a cash game. Do you play many tournaments, or are you like 95-100% cash game player? in a cash game, your advice is surely the best way to play it, either pushing or folding, even if i didnt believe he would call the push, and i did believe he would call 4k, simply for the image factor to get paid in other hands |
|
| Last edit: 05/12/2005 17:20 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|