Show hand : 16098

Handnr: 16098
Submitted by : Moloch

PokerStars Game #4302882286: Hold'em No Limit ($0.05/$0.10) - 2006/03/15 - 22:58:33 (ET)
Table 'Becrux III' Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: BCLS776 ($8.05 in chips)
Seat 2: shloomp ($3.25 in chips)
Seat 3: sloryde66 ($7.25 in chips)
Seat 4: nealkas ($5.35 in chips)
Seat 6: T.J. Combo ($9.65 in chips)
Seat 7: ipokeder ($13.40 in chips)
Seat 8: Anapra ($7.25 in chips)
Seat 9: halbrown ($16.35 in chips)
BCLS776: posts small blind $0.05
shloomp: posts big blind $0.10

Holecards
Dealt to ipokeder
sloryde66: calls $0.10
nealkas: folds
T.J. Combo: folds
ipokeder: calls $0.10
Anapra: folds
halbrown: calls $0.10
BCLS776: folds
shloomp: checks

Flop (Pot : $0.45)

   
shloomp: checks
sloryde66: checks
ipokeder: checks
halbrown: bets $0.10
shloomp: calls $0.10
sloryde66: calls $0.10
ipokeder: calls $0.10

Turn (Pot : $0.85)

   
shloomp: bets $0.30
sloryde66: calls $0.30
ipokeder: raises $0.70 to $1
halbrown: calls $1
shloomp: raises $2.05 to $3.05 and is all-in
sloryde66: calls $2.75
ipokeder said, "mm, this is definitely a tough laydown"
ipokeder: folds
halbrown: calls $2.05

River (Pot : $11)

   
sloryde66: checks
halbrown: checks

Showdown
shloomp: shows (a flush, Queen high)
sloryde66: mucks hand
halbrown: mucks hand
shloomp collected $10.45 from pot

Summary
Total pot $11 | Rake $0.55
Board  
Seat 1: BCLS776 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: shloomp (big blind) showed and won ($10.45) with a flush, Queen high
Seat 3: sloryde66 mucked
Seat 4: nealkas folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: T.J. Combo folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: ipokeder folded on the Turn
Seat 8: Anapra folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: halbrown (button) mucked

Comments

Verbloten   Australia. Mar 15 2006 21:11. Posts 1889 strange laydown too - why on earth do you fold this? you have a flush and 2 others are interested in playing - one guy goes all in for an extra 2 bucks to you and one guy with a bigger stack flat calls - you should have raised! edit: just noticed another guy was also still in - you do realise that once the shorty went all in - you would have won the other pot - you had to believe you had the best or at least second best hand right?   Last edit: 15/03/2006 21:14

Fayth    Canada. Mar 15 2006 21:20. Posts 10085 not worth it, i would have folded as well Im not sure what to do tomorrow when I see her, should I shake her hand?? -Floofy

Moloch   United States. Mar 15 2006 21:35. Posts 6144 well it was horribly obvious from flop play that there were flush drawers, so the hands i'm likely up against that are flushes are 23h [less likely that somebody would play this], 67h (which would obviously give them a straight flush), 79h. anything else would be facecard+x or facecard+facecard flush drawer which had me dominated, so only 79h and 23h lose my T high flush. i didn't think it was worth paying $2 to find out, and i made the correct laydown not the most sophisticated analysis but that's what went through my head -_-; even on these limits it's unlikely that somebody would go all in with K+good kicker or 2pair seeing how the flop and turn were played and the obvious straight + flush draw on the board even the guy with the set told me afterward that he went all in hoping for a boat, knowing that someone else had a flush -_-;;;; pokerintheface Last edit: 15/03/2006 21:37

tapatapa   Brasil. Mar 15 2006 21:44. Posts 185 first of all if u are folding why do u play these low flushes?

YoMeR   United States. Mar 15 2006 21:46. Posts 12438 no, the lay down isn't a bad one at all. I would have made the same lay down...it isn't hard. To add to the case of folding the A of hearts isn't out there either making it likely someone is holding it. eZ Life.

All hands submitted by Moloch: