Show hand : 204161

Handnr: 204161
Submitted by : [vital]Myth

PokerStars Game #10209523274: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2007/06/01 - 00:49:18 (ET)
Table 'Nereid III' 9-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: xcusex ($452.75 in chips)
Seat 2: Weak Tite ($198 in chips)
Seat 3: magicfan217 ($218 in chips)
Seat 4: Tecknowledgy ($221.85 in chips)
Seat 5: yome ($78 in chips)
Seat 6: Infitilt ($348.90 in chips)
Seat 7: acecatcher26 ($81 in chips)
Seat 8: Buffalo 78 ($257.75 in chips)
Seat 9: smerks ($231 in chips)
Buffalo 78: posts small blind $1
smerks: posts big blind $2

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Tecknowledgy
xcusex: calls $2
Weak Tite: calls $2
magicfan217: calls $2
Tecknowledgy : calls $2
yome: calls $2
Infitilt: calls $2
acecatcher26: calls $2
Buffalo 78: folds
smerks: checks

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $17.00)

   
smerks: checks
xcusex: checks
Weak Tite: bets $12
magicfan217: calls $12
Tecknowledgy : calls $12
yome: folds
Infitilt: folds
acecatcher26: folds
smerks: folds
xcusex: raises $100 to $112
Weak Tite: raises $84 to $196 and is all-in
magicfan217: raises $20 to $216 and is all-in
Tecknowledgy : folds
xcusex: calls $104

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $657.00)

   

River (Pot : $657.00)

   

Showdown
xcusex: shows (a flush, Nine high)
magicfan217: mucks hand
xcusex collected $40 from side pot
Weak Tite: mucks hand
xcusex collected $614 from main pot

Summary
Total pot $657 Main pot $614. Side pot $40. | Rake $3
Board  
Seat 1: xcusex showed and won ($654) with a flush, Nine high
Seat 2: Weak Tite mucked
Seat 3: magicfan217 mucked
Seat 4: Tecknowledgy folded on the Flop
Seat 5: yome folded on the Flop
Seat 6: Infitilt folded on the Flop
Seat 7: acecatcher26 (button) folded on the Flop
Seat 8: Buffalo 78 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 9: smerks (big blind) folded on the Flop

Comments

[vital]Myth    United States. May 31 2007 22:52. Posts 12159 i dodged a setup...sick. Eh, I can go a few more orbits in life, before taxes blind me out - PoorUser

Baalim   Mexico. May 31 2007 22:53. Posts 34262 thats a really strange fold... u have to put somebody on 99 to be profitable, u have definitelly fullhouse odds Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online

Day[9]   United States. May 31 2007 22:54. Posts 3447 oh my god

Ket    United Kingdom. May 31 2007 22:57. Posts 8665 dont ppl raise pf with 99 in nit ring

Tien   Canada. May 31 2007 22:57. Posts 1605 what horrible full ring players. My god. Limp with 24s UTG. Only one life to live

mrwongie   Canada. May 31 2007 22:57. Posts 1710 WOW that was a nice fold, cant believe you actually put someone on 99.

TheGfactor   United States. May 31 2007 22:58. Posts 126 this hand was played terribly in so many ways by so many players lol

[vital]Myth    United States. May 31 2007 23:00. Posts 12159 i'm drawing really thin because i'm usually up against at least bottom set, blocking several outs, and very often one person has top set here Eh, I can go a few more orbits in life, before taxes blind me out - PoorUser

[vital]Myth    United States. May 31 2007 23:01. Posts 12159   On May 31 2007 21:57 Ket wrote: dont ppl raise pf with 99 in nit ring weak tite limps 99 here for certain, i have a ton of hands on him Eh, I can go a few more orbits in life, before taxes blind me out - PoorUser

[vital]Myth    United States. May 31 2007 23:18. Posts 12159   On May 31 2007 21:53 Baal wrote: thats a really strange fold... u have to put somebody on 99 to be profitable, u have definitelly fullhouse odds i definitely do not...what's my equity when most of my outs are in other players' hands? Eh, I can go a few more orbits in life, before taxes blind me out - PoorUser

All hands submitted by [vital]Myth: