here you go noman.

practically no odds again, and look what happens

just because you won doesnt make it good play.

You had alot better odds here and he had a hand that really pays good thing the board didnt pair though.

.40 : $18.15


good play no matter how you look at it

this is different than the J10 hand though, a set pays off flushes way more than pairs

On April 09 2006 06:53 nomanirvana wrote: You had alot better odds here and he had a hand that really pays good thing the board didnt pair though.

thank you captain obvious

On April 09 2006 06:57 nomanirvana wrote: this is different than the J10 hand though, a set pays off flushes way more than pairs

2 pair pays off to runner runner with my maniac img.


and this hand still uses the "runner runner 4th flush draw theory"

On April 09 2006 06:48 byrnesam wrote: just because you won doesnt make it good play.

WRONG.
RESULTS = PROOF.

Mad for the love of god stop trying to convince yourself that this was a good play. This play is just really really terrible. Especially the river check.

I never said it was a good or correct play... I just posted to show how I (usually) stack micro fish, giving ideas for others so not everyone just sits there and lets PT control their every action.

Then the tight passive pussy, hateing bitches tried to act all high and mighty and act like its the worst play ever seen, ever.

Admit it, its not as bad as some darkexpert shit

On April 09 2006 07:26 mad1337nes wrote: I never said it was a good or correct play... I just posted to show how I (usually) stack micro fish, giving ideas for others so not everyone just sits there and lets PT control their every action. Then the tight passive pussy, hateing bitches tried to act all high and mighty and act like its the worst play ever seen, ever. Admit it, its not as bad as some darkexpert shit

No your play is terrible. Do you realize you attempted to check raise the river, do you not understand how awful this is? If he has like kj, qj there is a good chance he just checks behind and suddenly you made nothing after chasing a gutshot and runner flush draw. And if he is strong and has something like a set you are going to get it in without the river check raise. And this isant even the only thing wrong with your hand. This play is terrible it reminds me exactly of how dark plays.

The worst part is calling UTG with Q8s.

edit: the check raise on the river is ok if you know the guy is really aggressive and will try to take it down with a weakish hand, otherwise just bet normally. In this case the flush might be too scary even for an aggressive player though, since you were obviously drawing at something.

He is checkraising an unraised pot where the guy has bet min and then .20 there is no way check raise river can be right here.

Min bets can mean a big hand at $10 nl because people are too afraid of betting too much and having the opponent fold. Still I agree it's not the best play.

On April 09 2006 07:59 ShardPhoenix wrote: Min bets can mean a big hand at $10 nl because people are too afraid of betting too much and having the opponent fold. Still I agree it's not the best play.

in that case you really wouldn't need to check-raise if villain is going to push his stack anyway with that big hand right?