retarded river bet ?

yeah bad river bet between the Q on turn and diamond on river and the way he played it a draw was kind of obvious

agree, check the river and i woul bet harder the turn, it seemed obvious he was drawing.

Not as retarded as the turn. lots of hands can beat you here in a not-raised pot (3str8s and all the flush). Actually the only hand that might call you on the river that you had beat here is AQ and he probably doesnt have that or are some people that dumb to limp with AQo from UTG+1 at 2/4 tables??

looks more like some kind of two pair or maybe 666, betting out on the flop and just calling my raise. When he quickly checked the river it really looked like something i could extract more value from. But i guess i should have checked behind.

I think the spot he was in on the river he's only going to call with a straight or a flush, and you're trying to make a value bet here, not a bluff. bet less or check behind?

capaneo what are you talking about ? he doesnt have AQ lol, even though its lots of people who limp AQ utg. Likely holdings are 66 and 98 and maybe Q9. And i want more money from those hands.

Turn bet retarded? wtf ? If i bet the turn i can fold to a push, its not likely that he'll push without a straight there, because if he didnt have a straight, he woulda been worried that i had it. If i check the turn though, I'll have to call down like an idiot.

and wtf do you know about what people play at the 2/4 ? do you have alot of experience from 2/4 ? just because its midstakes doesnt mean theyre all geniuses.

On April 13 2006 18:24 iamalex wrote: I think the spot he was in on the river he's only going to call with a straight or a flush, and you're trying to make a value bet here, not a bluff. bet less or check behind?

well actually with that bet im trying to make the donk persuade himself into believing im bluffing and that his two pair/bottom set is good. anyways, i guess checking behind is more reasonable.

T_T

3 quick responses

3 players that play micro limits