 |
nicksson Sweden. Oct 04 2007 06:31. Posts 4662 | | |
fold turn, but if you call you can not fold this riv |
|
|
 |
wobbly_au Australia. Oct 04 2007 06:32. Posts 6540 | | |
lol? why the fuck did u call turn if u fold a Q river? |
|
|
|
 |
Baalim Mexico. Oct 04 2007 06:34. Posts 34286 | | |
|
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
|
 |
Verbloten Australia. Oct 04 2007 06:36. Posts 1889 | | |
because i would have called the river if he bet like 2 or 3 - but he virtually potted the river and i figured my queen can't be good - he thinks one last chance to get some value for his nuts... that's how i saw it anyway - but that's why i am interested in your opinions - so please more if you guys can |
|
|
 |
Gumster Sweden. Oct 04 2007 06:39. Posts 2291 | | |
wtffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff |
|
Do not push the river, it will flow by itself. - Polish proverb | |
|
|
 |
Verbloten Australia. Oct 04 2007 06:40. Posts 1889 | | |
i also figure in this situation - i've got nothing invested and would prefer to lose a 3 dollars rather than 8 when my gut tells me i'm beat. I was like 70% sure i had best hand on the turn and wanted a cheap showdown - woulda called 1/2 pot or a bit more (ie; 70% sure) but meh not this river bet...
is my reasoning sound or wats up? I'm definately not playing weaktight like i used to - and i don't necessarily think this is weak - i think it's just w/e really... funny situation though cause i actually hit my fucking card |
|
|
 |
nicksson Sweden. Oct 04 2007 06:40. Posts 4662 | | |
if river is a blank do you call a 3$ bet? |
|
|
 |
Verbloten Australia. Oct 04 2007 06:41. Posts 1889 | | |
and guys - seriously please don't tilt me with your ROFLs and your fucking WTFs because that's just gay OK - grow up and put together a more meaningful response or don't respond at al FFS |
|
|
 |
TianYuan Korea (South). Oct 04 2007 06:41. Posts 6817 | | |
| On October 04 2007 05:36 Verbloten wrote:
because i would have called the river if he bet like 2 or 3 - but he virtually potted the river and i figured my queen can't be good - he thinks one last chance to get some value for his nuts... that's how i saw it anyway - but that's why i am interested in your opinions - so please more if you guys can |
He might just as easily be thinking "Shit I have 3 high I better bet or I'll lose >____<" |
|
|
|
 |
Verbloten Australia. Oct 04 2007 06:42. Posts 1889 | | |
nicksson - I would have called a river bet of 3.5 with my queen. lol
I would call a river bet of 2-3 probably if it was a 2 of spades or similar brick yes |
|
|
 |
Verbloten Australia. Oct 04 2007 06:44. Posts 1889 | | |
| On October 04 2007 05:41 TianYuan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 04 2007 05:36 Verbloten wrote:
because i would have called the river if he bet like 2 or 3 - but he virtually potted the river and i figured my queen can't be good - he thinks one last chance to get some value for his nuts... that's how i saw it anyway - but that's why i am interested in your opinions - so please more if you guys can |
He might just as easily be thinking "Shit I have 3 high I better bet or I'll lose >____<"
|
you really think someone would do that with the queen hitting on the river and that board like it is - and btw he insta bet the river 5 too...
I definately think he either has the nuts or close or absolutely nothing. He doesn't have a 6, 7 or Q.. i don't think there - he would look for a showdown with a hand with showdown value. |
|
|
 |
Gumster Sweden. Oct 04 2007 06:54. Posts 2291 | | |
since you called turn it's just about impossible to put you on a Q
why doesnt he have a weaker Q?
so easy call, seriously this is very elementary |
|
Do not push the river, it will flow by itself. - Polish proverb | |
|
|
 |
DONKEYLUVIN United States. Oct 04 2007 10:16. Posts 292 | | |
I don't understand why you didn't bet flop in the first place. You'd gain so much information for later in the hand. |
|
|
|