PokerStars Game #5095980126: Hold'em No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2006/05/30 - 00:25:32 (ET)
Table 'Andraimon II' 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: mredlark ($24.50 in chips)
Seat 2: capaneo ($29 in chips)
Seat 3: dennisa ($17.95 in chips)
Seat 4: flex2521031 ($5.40 in chips)
Seat 5: justplainluk ($48.85 in chips)
Seat 6: LincolnK ($23.35 in chips)
Seat 7: reynolds25 ($13.55 in chips)
Seat 8: Radio ($8.90 in chips)
Seat 9: labingmucker ($19.85 in chips)
mredlark: posts small blind $0.10
capaneo: posts big blind $0.25
Holecards
Dealt to capaneo
dennisa: calls $0.25
flex2521031: folds
justplainluk: calls $0.25
LincolnK: folds
reynolds25: raises $0.75 to $1
Radio: folds
labingmucker: folds
mredlark: folds
capaneo: raises $2 to $3
dennisa: folds
justplainluk: calls $2.75
reynolds25: folds
Flop (Pot : $7.35)
capaneo: bets $4
justplainluk: calls $4
Turn (Pot : $15.35)
capaneo: bets $10
justplainluk: calls $10
River (Pot : $35.35)
capaneo: bets $12 and is all-in
justplainluk: calls $12
Showdown
capaneo: shows (two pair, Aces and Eights)
justplainluk: mucks hand
capaneo collected $56.50 from pot
Summary
Total pot $59.35 | Rake $2.85
Board
Seat 1: mredlark (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: capaneo (big blind) showed and won ($56.50) with two pair, Aces and Eights
Seat 3: dennisa folded before Flop
Seat 4: flex2521031 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: justplainluk mucked
Seat 6: LincolnK folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: reynolds25 folded before Flop
Seat 8: Radio folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: labingmucker (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
1
|
capaneo   Canada. May 29 2006 22:28. Posts 8465 | | |
OMFG!!!! motherfucker was callin me with that shit! |
|
In US everyone is happy as long as all the prices are rising. Unless its crude oil - Marc Faber | |
|
|
0
|
Moloch   United States. May 29 2006 22:29. Posts 6144 | | |
unless you got a really good read here you need to stop reraising with AQo full ring
especially at these shit limits |
|
|
|
0
|
Moloch   United States. May 29 2006 22:29. Posts 6144 | | |
and why do you play 50NL 6-max but 25NL full ring? shouldn't it be the other way around cuz 6-max has more variance and is more difficult to play |
|
pokerintheface | Last edit: 29/05/2006 22:30 |
|
|
1
|
capaneo   Canada. May 29 2006 22:30. Posts 8465 | | |
well about the 50nl and 25nl. I was playin 100nl before and I moved down before because of cashout and a bad run. I really don't know about variance and stuff but the way I'm doin it now it works really well for me. |
|
In US everyone is happy as long as all the prices are rising. Unless its crude oil - Marc Faber | Last edit: 29/05/2006 22:33 |
|
|
1
|
capaneo   Canada. May 29 2006 22:31. Posts 8465 | | |
| On May 29 2006 21:29 Pokerintheface wrote:
unless you got a really good read here you need to stop reraising with AQo full ring
especially at these shit limits |
you kiddin right? |
|
In US everyone is happy as long as all the prices are rising. Unless its crude oil - Marc Faber | |
|
|
0
|
Moloch   United States. May 29 2006 22:31. Posts 6144 | | |
|
|
|
1
|
capaneo   Canada. May 29 2006 22:35. Posts 8465 | | |
| On May 29 2006 21:31 Pokerintheface wrote:
no |
well for one thing I never call a raise, unless I'm %100 sure I'm behind or I have quads. |
|
In US everyone is happy as long as all the prices are rising. Unless its crude oil - Marc Faber | |
|
|
1
|
crispy4505   United States. May 29 2006 22:44. Posts 509 | | |
still dont see the point of reraising there is...... |
|
|
0
|
Moloch   United States. May 29 2006 23:02. Posts 6144 | | |
| On May 29 2006 21:35 capaneo wrote:
well for one thing I never call a raise, unless I'm %100 sure I'm behind or I have quads.
|
why would you never call a raise unless you're behind
what the fuck are you talking about |
|
|
|
1
|
vvvQ   . May 30 2006 00:51. Posts 2134 | | |
i re-raise AQ in full-ring all the time, but only vs late positoin raisers that raise a variety of hands |
|
|
|
|