Show hand : 383511

Handnr: 383511
Submitted by : TheHuHu

PokerStars Game #15250439481: Hold'em No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2008/02/12 - 23:46:49 (ET)
Table 'Kalypso II' 6-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: PandaSaurus ($26.65 in chips)
Seat 2: MisterOllie ($29.90 in chips)
Seat 3: jfgodtheg ($25.25 in chips)
Seat 4: DCAMP96 ($22.35 in chips)
Seat 5: rogue090 ($30.55 in chips)
Seat 6: L0L_WUT ($28.30 in chips)
jfgodtheg: posts small blind $0.10
DCAMP96: posts big blind $0.25

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to L0L_WUT
rogue090: raises $0.25 to $0.50
L0L_WUT : raises $2 to $2.50
PandaSaurus: folds
MisterOllie: folds
jfgodtheg: folds
DCAMP96: folds
rogue090: raises $4 to $6.50
L0L_WUT : raises $10.50 to $17
rogue090: calls $10.50

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $34.35)

   
rogue090: bets $13.55 and is all-in
L0L_WUT : calls $11.30 and is all-in

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $56.95)

   

River (Pot : $56.95)

   

Showdown
rogue090: shows (high card Ace)
L0L_WUT : shows (a pair of Aces)
L0L_WUT collected $54.20 from pot

Summary
Total pot $56.95 | Rake $2.75
Board  
Seat 1: PandaSaurus folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: MisterOllie (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: jfgodtheg (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: DCAMP96 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: rogue090 showed and lost with high card Ace
Seat 6: L0L_WUT showed and won ($54.20) with a pair of Aces

This makes no sense to me... If you are going to go all-in on a flop you completely missed, why not just go all-in preflop?

Comments

All hands submitted by TheHuHu: