https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international    Contact            Users: 627 Active, 2 Logged in - Time: 04:33

Show hand : 40140

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Back Submit a hand   

Handnr: 40140
Submitted by : Vic3Roy

PokerStars Game #5287471307: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2006/06/18 - 01:49:18 (ET)
Table 'Schwall' 9-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: RUNVS ($164 in chips)
Seat 2: sklaaaaar ($86.50 in chips)
Seat 3: Random Move ($94 in chips)
Seat 4: Vic3Roy ($108.05 in chips)
Seat 5: MrMoo1 ($155.10 in chips)
Seat 6: sherlock37 ($73.95 in chips)
Seat 7: kaje17 ($131.85 in chips)
Seat 8: Fourmill ($44.70 in chips)
Seat 9: ulaanbaatar ($100.40 in chips)
Random Move: posts small blind $0.50
Vic3Roy: posts big blind $1

Holecards
Dealt to Vic3Roy QdQc
MrMoo1: folds
sherlock37: folds
MrMoo1 leaves the table
kaje17: folds
Fourmill: folds
ulaanbaatar: folds
RUNVS: raises $2 to $3
sklaaaaar: folds
Random Move: folds
Vic3Roy: raises $5 to $8
RUNVS: calls $5

Flop (Pot : $16.5)

   9c8hJh
Vic3Roy: bets $15
RUNVS: raises $15 to $30
Vic3Roy: raises $70.05 to $100.05 and is all-in
RUNVS: calls $70.05

Turn (Pot : $216.6)

   9c8hJhAh

River (Pot : $216.6)

   9c8hJhAh8d

Showdown
Vic3Roy: shows QdQc (two pair, Queens and Eights)
RUNVS: mucks hand
Vic3Roy collected $213.60 from pot

Summary
Total pot $216.60 | Rake $3
Board  9c8hJhAh8d
Seat 1: RUNVS mucked QhJc
Seat 2: sklaaaaar (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: Random Move (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: Vic3Roy (big blind) showed QdQc and won ($213.60) with two pair, Queens and Eights
Seat 5: MrMoo1 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: sherlock37 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: kaje17 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: Fourmill folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: ulaanbaatar folded before Flop (didn't bet)

Also want to share your poker hands? Register an account for free

Comments

Forum Index > pokerhands
Vic3Roy   Finland. Jun 17 2006 23:52. Posts 3049

Insta-call, I was like omg omg... ;D

Facebook Twitter
Bigaboo 

Baalim   Mexico. Jun 17 2006 23:57. Posts 34262

why 50nl then 100nl, then 50nl then 200nl then 100nl? weird o_o

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

Vic3Roy   Finland. Jun 18 2006 00:02. Posts 3049

8D

Coz 50nl I can make such a good money a day, but with over-br it's so boring, 100nl I'm not good at and 200nl is easy but I don't have good enough br for it.

Currently trying to learn 100nl properly, figured out couple useful tricks already

Bigaboo 

Baalim   Mexico. Jun 18 2006 00:37. Posts 34262

how could you be better at 200nl than at 100nl, makes no sense

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

Muck21   Russian Federation. Jun 18 2006 00:42. Posts 540

well, I feel the same way as Vic, 100NL players are the epitome of tight grinders, whereas from 200NL players start to loosen up and play LAG more often. given that you have the br to handle the swings at 200NL, i must say that 200NL is probably easier to handle for most TAG players.

Muck it, bitch 

Muck21   Russian Federation. Jun 18 2006 00:43. Posts 540

the point being, there are way too many grinders playing poker for a living at 100NL.

Muck it, bitch 

 

All hands submitted by Vic3Roy:






Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2024. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap