Show hand : 4103

Handnr: 4103
Submitted by : Daut

PokerStars Game #3515005385: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2006/01/02 - 20:33:52 (ET)
Table 'Wempe' Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: Wpt_Winner ($115.35 in chips)
Seat 2: bgbjr ($115.30 in chips)
Seat 3: Zack864 ($113.30 in chips)
Seat 4: Daut44 ($98 in chips)
Seat 5: BlackRain79 ($100 in chips)
Seat 6: wouldman ($158.65 in chips)
Seat 7: Detonate ($103 in chips)
Seat 8: PRCS ($116.45 in chips)
Seat 9: toomanyclubs ($99 in chips)
PRCS: posts small blind $0.50
toomanyclubs: posts big blind $1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Daut44 ]
Wpt_Winner: calls $1
bgbjr: calls $1
Zack864: folds
Daut44: raises $5 to $6
BlackRain79: folds
wouldman: folds
Detonate: folds
PRCS: folds
toomanyclubs: folds
Wpt_Winner: folds
bgbjr: calls $5
*** FLOP *** ]
bgbjr: checks
Daut44: bets $8
bgbjr: calls $8
*** TURN *** ]
bgbjr: checks
Daut44: checks
*** RIVER *** ]
bgbjr: bets $15
Daut44 said, "ugh"
Daut44 said, "would you really check call without odds on a flush draw"
Daut44: calls $15
*** SHOW DOWN ***
bgbjr: shows ] (a flush, Queen high)
Daut44: mucks hand
bgbjr collected $57.55 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $60.50 | Rake $2.95
Board ]
Seat 1: Wpt_Winner folded before Flop
Seat 2: bgbjr showed ] and won ($57.55) with a flush, Queen high
Seat 3: Zack864 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: Daut44 mucked ]
Seat 5: BlackRain79 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: wouldman folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: Detonate (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: PRCS (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 9: toomanyclubs (big blind) folded before Flop

Comments

Karma    Australia. Jan 02 2006 18:42. Posts 3538 Why didnt you bet the turn? Youre kinda giving yourself a choice to fold to a large river bet yet you called anyway? Your thoughts? fish mentality Last edit: 04/01/2006 05:58

Arya   United States. Jan 02 2006 18:48. Posts 1631 why didn't you bet the turn... if he reraises you, you KNOW he has a flush, if he doesn't he'll fold, if he flat calls you can probably check behind on river? what if he has one spade and river brings 4th spade?   Last edit: 02/01/2006 18:49

Daut    United States. Jan 02 2006 18:52. Posts 8955 people check call with flushes i was pretty sure he had a flush i checked behind to minimize size of pot i didnt care if the river came spade, it was a 1 out of 5 shot anyway NewbSaibot: 18 TIMES THE SPEED OF LIGHT. Because FUCK YOU, Daut

Arya   United States. Jan 02 2006 18:56. Posts 1631 but then why call?

Daut    United States. Jan 02 2006 18:57. Posts 8955 cause i was getting 3:1 only had to be right 1 out of 4 i thought he might have had 88 or a 9 there but i was pretty sure he had a flush NewbSaibot: 18 TIMES THE SPEED OF LIGHT. Because FUCK YOU, Daut

Swedishhero   Sweden. Jan 02 2006 19:13. Posts 294 sorry if iam wrong, Why go by the book, when you pretty sure he had flush, Isnt it dumb?Id rather do what I belive mamma mia

JizzleSmitts   United States. Jan 02 2006 22:07. Posts 1217 because its 15 bucks for 42 dollars So if he makes this call 4 times, and wins once, he makes money. You can't always guess what your opponent has. Now, if this scrub had bet the pot or 2/3 of the pot, then Bigballs probably would have had to lay it down, but then its more questionable. A perfect play i would say.

JizzleSmitts   United States. Jan 02 2006 22:10. Posts 1217 because its 15 bucks for 42 dollars So if he makes this call 4 times, and wins once, he makes money. You can't always guess what your opponent has. Now, if this scrub had bet the pot or 2/3 of the pot, then Bigballs probably would have had to lay it down, but then its more questionable. A perfect play i would say.

All hands submitted by Daut: