PokerStars Game #16791088880: Hold'em No Limit ($3/$6) - 2008/04/17 - 07:50:37 (ET)
Table 'Laomedon V' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($764.60 in chips)
Seat 2: donkydynamit ($724.75 in chips)
Seat 3: redeye3030 ($1090 in chips)
Seat 4: Northern Tex ($154.20 in chips)
Seat 5: QuickStilz ($597 in chips)
Seat 6: banditos19 ($390 in chips)
QuickStilz: posts small blind $3
banditos19: posts big blind $6
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero
Hero : raises $15 to $21
donkydynamit: folds
redeye3030: raises $45 to $66
Northern Tex: folds
QuickStilz: folds
banditos19: folds
Hero : calls $45
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $141.00)
Hero : checks
redeye3030: bets $102
Hero : raises $138 to $240
redeye3030: raises $784 to $1024 and is all-in
Hero : calls $458.60 and is all-in
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $1,538.20)
River (Pot : $1,538.20)
Showdown
Hero : shows (three of a kind, Threes)
redeye3030: shows (three of a kind, Aces)
redeye3030 collected $1535.20 from pot
Hero said, "ugh"
Summary
Total pot $1538.20 | Rake $3
Board
Seat 1: Hero showed and lost with three of a kind, Threes
Seat 2: donkydynamit folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: redeye3030 showed and won ($1535.20) with three of a kind, Aces
Seat 4: Northern Tex (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: QuickStilz (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: banditos19 (big blind) folded before Flop
1
|
lachlan   Australia. Apr 17 2008 05:57. Posts 6991 | | |
hey baal,
is it profitable to call his 3 bet preflop with 3's?
i thought it was a no no since u are not getting very good odds
however i noticed u are slightly deep so maybe that justifies it, can u fill me in on why u calleD? |
|
|
|
4
|
Baalim   Mexico. Apr 17 2008 05:58. Posts 34262 | | |
his range is narrow and his 3-bet is small so my odds are good |
|
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
|
1
|
wobbly_au   Australia. Apr 17 2008 05:58. Posts 6540 | | |
what he is getting INSAnE odds to call pref |
|
|
|
1
|
lachlan   Australia. Apr 17 2008 06:07. Posts 6991 | | |
lol i just did some maths and EV calculations and you are right, its way +EV to call here, i didnt realise
Fold = $0
Call = -$45 * 7.5 + (794 * 1 * 0.85) + (-720 * 1 * 0.15)
= +$229.4 (assuming you stack him every time)
Assuming he has AA,KK and stacks 50% of the time, and has AK other 50% and u check/fold when u dont hit set:
(0.5 * -$45 * 7.5 + (794 * 1 * 0.85) + (-720 * 1 * 0.15) )+
(0.5 * -$45 * 7.5 + (98 + 102)
= +$229.4 + $29.25
= +$258.65 overall vs AK,KK,AA
free $250 bucks every time u call here vs that range, nice : )
|
|
full ring | Last edit: 17/04/2008 06:18 |
|
|
1
|
MysticJoey   Poland. Apr 17 2008 06:12. Posts 1430 | | |
well its not that big because he have chances of hiting his own set just like here, but ye, still +Ev |
|
|
1
|
PokerDoc88   Australia. Apr 17 2008 06:13. Posts 3527 | | |
you should muck those 3s pre son, you should know the bullets are coming! |
|
| Last edit: 17/04/2008 06:13 |
|
|
1
|
traktor   Czech Republic. Apr 17 2008 06:14. Posts 372 | | |
| On April 17 2008 05:07 lachlan wrote:
(assuming you stack him every time)
|
That is far from truth... |
|
|
1
|
lachlan   Australia. Apr 17 2008 06:15. Posts 6991 | | |
| On April 17 2008 05:12 MysticJoey wrote:
well its not that big because he have chances of hiting his own set just like here, but ye, still +Ev |
yea true, fixed. being deep by 20% of so makes this easily profitable |
|
|
|
1
|
lachlan   Australia. Apr 17 2008 06:16. Posts 6991 | | |
| On April 17 2008 05:14 traktor wrote:
That is far from truth...
|
yeah but im only assuming he's stacking off with AA or KK which even if its only a 50% chance he has its still way profitable to call |
|
|
|
1
|
Twisted   Netherlands. Apr 17 2008 06:19. Posts 10422 | | |
Calling 3bets with low PP's is spew except when it's deep and it's against a nit. Against a loose agressive player in 6max calling with a low PP preflop is spew because you only take his stack in big setup hands (which don't happen often) and most of the time you're gonna have to fold it.
This hand it's kinda iffy because it's 125bb deep and his reraise is under potsize. He's not getting ridiculous odds at all. This isn't FR where everyone who 3bets has QQ+ Wobbly. |
|
|
1
|
wobbly_au   Australia. Apr 17 2008 06:20. Posts 6540 | | |
| On April 17 2008 05:19 Twisted wrote:
Calling 3bets with low PP's is spew except when it's deep and it's against a nit. Against a loose agressive player in 6max calling with a low PP preflop is spew because you only take his stack in big setup hands (which don't happen often) and most of the time you're gonna have to fold it.
This hand it's kinda iffy because it's 125bb deep and his reraise is under potsize. He's not getting ridiculous odds at all. This isn't FR where everyone who 3bets has QQ+ Wobbly. |
lol FR isnt that nitty yo
but u may be right. i dont know enuf about villains 3bet range to make a judgement. |
|
The Last Laugh. | Last edit: 17/04/2008 06:25 |
|
|
1
|
lachlan   Australia. Apr 17 2008 06:21. Posts 6991 | | |
| On April 17 2008 05:19 Twisted wrote:
Calling 3bets with low PP's is spew except when it's deep and it's against a nit. Against a loose agressive player in 6max calling with a low PP preflop is spew because you only take his stack in big setup hands (which don't happen often) and most of the time you're gonna have to fold it.
This hand it's kinda iffy because it's 125bb deep and his reraise is under potsize. He's not getting ridiculous odds at all. This isn't FR where everyone who 3bets has QQ+ Wobbly. |
hmm yeah you are right... hey what % of the time do u think he would have a hand he is stacking off with? i want to work out more EV
eg: what % does he have QQ KK AA here opposed to AK and other shit he is folding to the check raise |
|
full ring | Last edit: 17/04/2008 06:22 |
|
|
1
|
1
|
wobbly_au   Australia. Apr 17 2008 06:32. Posts 6540 | | |
yea they are either nits or super loose passive donks~ barring the TAGS |
|
|
|
|