Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 465467 Submitted by : Robinson47
PokerStars Game #18106231940: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2008/06/13 - 08:48:37 (ET)
Table 'Chiron' 2-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Eduts ($1145.75 in chips)
Seat 2: Robinson47 ($402.50 in chips)
Eduts: posts small blind $1
Robinson47 : posts big blind $2
Holecards(Odds) Dealt to Robinson47
Eduts: raises $4 to $6
Robinson47 : raises $16 to $22
Eduts: calls $16
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $44.00)
Robinson47 : bets $32
Eduts: calls $32
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $108.00)
Robinson47 : bets $88
Eduts: calls $88
River (Pot : $284.00)
Robinson47 : bets $260.50 and is all-in
Eduts: calls $260.50
Showdown Robinson47 : shows (a pair of Queens)
Eduts: shows (two pair, Queens and Eights)
Robinson47 said, "nice call wp you owned me hehe i cant put ten jack down!!!!!"
Eduts collected $804.50 from pot
Summary Total pot $805 | Rake $0.50
Board
Seat 1: Eduts (button) (small blind) showed and won ($804.50) with two pair, Queens and Eights
Seat 2: Robinson47 (big blind) showed and lost with a pair of Queens
|
Comments |
|
1
|
Robinson47   United Kingdom. Jun 13 2008 07:02. Posts 992 | | |
on a scale of one to ten how bad is bluffing a safe river card, put him on small/middle pair, can i nominate this for retarded hand of the week? |
|
| 1
|
acdawg712   United States. Jun 13 2008 07:16. Posts 2639 | | |
this board is no good for bluffing off a small/middle pair. The paired board with 3 low cards is the type of board that people will snap call 88+ since your range is polarized to a monster or air unless your opponent thinks you can value shove 99+ here, which he apparently didn't. |
|
phil hellmuth is genuinely a stupid person and he does not understand poker very well at all - [vital]myth | |
|
| |
|