Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 468697 Submitted by : mad1337nes
PokerStars Game #18234787059: Hold'em No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2008/06/19 - 02:00:54 (ET)
Table 'Holmia III' 6-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: lordTasse ($110.50 in chips)
Seat 2: tripmaker1 ($12.10 in chips)
Seat 3: shipopotamus ($77.80 in chips)
Seat 4: sunhunter83 ($49.25 in chips)
Seat 5: blackziggy72 ($25.20 in chips)
Seat 6: Hero ($49.50 in chips)
Hero : posts small blind $0.25
lordTasse: posts big blind $0.50
Holecards(Odds) Dealt to Hero
tripmaker1: calls $0.50
shipopotamus: raises $2 to $2.50
sunhunter83: calls $2.50
blackziggy72: calls $2.50
Hero : raises $6.50 to $9
lordTasse: folds
tripmaker1: folds
shipopotamus: raises $68.80 to $77.80 and is all-in
sunhunter83: folds
blackziggy72: calls $22.70 and is all-in
Hero : calls $40.50 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($28.30) returned to shipopotamus
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $127.70)
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $127.70)
River (Pot : $127.70)
Showdown Hero : shows (two pair, Queens and Nines)
shipopotamus: shows (two pair, Aces and Kings)
shipopotamus collected $48.60 from side pot
blackziggy72: mucks hand
shipopotamus collected $76.10 from main pot
Summary Total pot $127.70 Main pot $76.10. Side pot $48.60. | Rake $3
Board
Seat 1: lordTasse (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: tripmaker1 folded before Flop
Seat 3: shipopotamus showed and won ($124.70) with two pair, Aces and Kings
Seat 4: sunhunter83 folded before Flop
Seat 5: blackziggy72 (button) mucked
Seat 6: Hero (small blind) showed and lost with two pair, Queens and Nines
|
Comments |
|
0
|
mad1337nes   United States. Jun 19 2008 00:03. Posts 2414 | | |
im seriously not complaining.... but can I win a flip one time after a string of huge redic setups?
one time? |
|
| 1
|
donkley   Canada. Jun 19 2008 00:34. Posts 15 | | |
how often are you up against worse in this spot at 50NL? |
|
| 1
|
lachlan   Australia. Jun 19 2008 00:47. Posts 6991 | | |
fold to his shove here w/o at least some evidence he's doing this with JJ or AQ, something u beat better then a flip |
|
|
| 4
|
TianYuan   Korea (South). Jun 19 2008 00:47. Posts 6817 | | |
Given all the dead money already in the pot after we squeeze, not to mention the huge overlay from blackziggy72 (.... KQo!?????) it would seem like a pretty ez call.
Like if we assign him QQ+ and AK we still call.
AND when people 4bet shove instead of 4bet smallish it's much more often AK in my experience. |
|
Hm.. Off-suite socks.. | Last edit: 19/06/2008 00:49 |
|
| 1
|
donkley   Canada. Jun 19 2008 01:00. Posts 15 | | |
overlay the only reason for call? |
|
| 4
|
TianYuan   Korea (South). Jun 19 2008 02:10. Posts 6817 | | |
No, I'd always call unless I thought he was a mega nit in which case I probably wouldn't 3bet. As long as he plays AK and QQ this way it's fine, and I think these days even NL50 regs will.
I havent played NL50 in a long time tho, back when I was playing NL50 I was sort of a nit and might have folded pre, who knows. |
|
Hm.. Off-suite socks.. | Last edit: 19/06/2008 02:12 |
|
| |
|