Handnr: 479492Submitted by : lazymej
PokerStars Game #18647466667: Hold'em No Limit ($0.05/$0.10) - 2008/07/07 - 11:55:38 (ET) Table 'Vogtia' 6-max Seat #1 is the button Seat 1: ELAS9 ($4.85 in chips) Seat 2: Krulinsky ($12.35 in chips) Seat 3: Gunner1014 ($7.80 in chips) Seat 4: Hero ($11.85 in chips) Seat 5: viper1973 ($2.60 in chips) Seat 6: PokerPatton ($4.05 in chips) Krulinsky: posts small blind $0.05 Gunner1014: posts big blind $0.10 HolecardsDealt to Hero Hero : raises $0.30 to $0.40 viper1973: folds PokerPatton: folds ELAS9: calls $0.40 Krulinsky: folds Gunner1014: folds Flop (Pot : $0.95) Hero : bets $0.60 ELAS9: calls $0.60 Turn (Pot : $2.15) Hero : bets $1.40 ELAS9: calls $1.40 River (Pot : $4.95) Hero : bets $9.45 and is all-in ELAS9: folds Uncalled bet ($9.45) returned to Hero Hero collected $4.75 from pot SummaryTotal pot $4.95 | Rake $0.20 Board Seat 1: ELAS9 (button) folded on the River Seat 2: Krulinsky (small blind) folded before Flop Seat 3: Gunner1014 (big blind) folded before Flop Seat 4: Hero collected ($4.75) Seat 5: viper1973 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 6: PokerPatton folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Do you guys think going all in as a bigger stack is more intimidating to the fish? Like maybe if I bet 3 dollars, which would also put him all in would make him call, because it looks less scary and bold. It just seems that way sometimes lol