PokerStars Game #21051177116: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2008/10/09 9:29:56 ET
Table 'Crater II' 9-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: dymarko ($37 in chips)
Seat 2: Arnolfini ($194 in chips)
Seat 3: molar123 ($101.45 in chips)
Seat 5: Tadidam ($44.30 in chips)
Seat 6: Jarox81 ($88 in chips)
Seat 8: AllTheWay33 ($192.90 in chips)
Seat 9: Artanis11 ($282.10 in chips)
molar123: posts small blind $1
GarryKas: is sitting out
Tadidam: posts big blind $2
Holecards Dealt to Artanis11
Jarox81: folds
AllTheWay33: raises $4 to $6
GarryKas has returned
GarryKas leaves the table
Artanis11 : calls $6
dymarko: folds
FakieThis joins the table at seat #4
Arnolfini: folds
molar123: folds
Tadidam: folds
Flop (Pot : $15.00)
AllTheWay33: checks
Artanis11 : checks
Turn (Pot : $15.00)
AllTheWay33: checks
Artanis11 : checks
River (Pot : $15.00)
AllTheWay33: bets $8
Artanis11 : raises $24 to $32
AllTheWay33: folds
Uncalled bet ($24) returned to Artanis11
Artanis11 collected $29.50 from pot
Artanis11 : doesn't show hand
Summary Total pot $31 | Rake $1.50
Board
Seat 1: dymarko folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: Arnolfini (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: molar123 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: Tadidam (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: Jarox81 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: AllTheWay33 folded on the River
Seat 9: Artanis11 collected ($29.50)
DustySwedeDude   Sweden. Oct 09 2008 09:35. Posts 8623
Well, you 100% can't have a bluff here unless you have a shitton of history, a read that he beats weak with marginal hands or if you're absolutely retarded.
1
Artanis[Xp]   Netherlands. Oct 09 2008 09:41. Posts 4697
On October 09 2008 08:35 DustySwedeDude wrote:
Well, you 100% can't have a bluff here unless you have a shitton of history, a read that he beats weak with marginal hands or if you're absolutely retarded.
his hand is so transparent that I could def bluff here imo.
1
DustySwedeDude   Sweden. Oct 09 2008 09:44. Posts 8623
Yea, but if you would bluff you'd done it earlier. By checking back turn you show that you either have a decent hand or total air that has given up, and why on earth would you decide that you can't bluff earlier but that you can do it on the best card in the deck for his range? If he calls AK here without knowing that you're turning made hands into bluffs fairly often he's stupid as shit.
1
Artanis[Xp]   Netherlands. Oct 09 2008 09:46. Posts 4697
On October 09 2008 08:44 DustySwedeDude wrote:
Yea, but if you would bluff you'd done it earlier. By checking back turn you show that you either have a decent hand or total air that has given up, and why on earth would you decide that you can't bluff earlier but that you can do it on the best card in the deck for his range? If he calls AK here without knowing that you're turning made hands into bluffs fairly often he's stupid as shit.
You're right. Perhaps I'm underestimating them, but I figured TPTK in a double checked pot = nuts to most regs.