Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 578955 Submitted by : terrybunny19240
Full Tilt Poker Game #9243385297: Table Summer Leaf - $0.10/$0.25 - No Limit Hold'em - 6:20:33 ET - 2008/11/30
Seat 1: Night2o11 ($26.70)
Seat 2: marcovich22 ($21.45)
Seat 3: darkalwin ($4.90)
Seat 4: label55 ($4.65)
Seat 5: Figo73 ($8.90)
Seat 6: csulok ($36.05)
Seat 7: Woolshed ($24.30)
Seat 8: makareena ($25)
Seat 9: Donjacky ($91.75)
csulok posts the small blind of $0.10
Woolshed posts the big blind of $0.25
The button is in seat #5
Holecards(Odds) Dealt to Night2o11
Donjacky raises to $0.85
Night2o11 calls $0.85
marcovich22 folds
darkalwin folds
label55 folds
Figo73 folds
csulok calls $0.75
Woolshed folds
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $2.80)
csulok bets $2.80
Donjacky folds
Night2o11 has 15 seconds left to act
Night2o11 has requested TIME
makareena has been disconnected
makareena has reconnected
Night2o11 raises to $10.25
csulok raises to $35.20, and is all in
Night2o11 calls $15.60, and is all in
csulok shows
Night2o11 shows
Uncalled bet of $9.35 returned to csulok
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $63.85)
River (Pot : $63.85)
csulok shows a full house, Sixes full of Threes
Night2o11 shows two pair, Tens and Threes
csulok wins the pot ($51.80) with a full house, Sixes full of Threes
Night2o11 adds $25
Summary Total pot $54.50 | Rake $2.70
Board:
Seat 1: Night2o11 showed and lost with two pair, Tens and Threes
Seat 2: marcovich22 didn't bet (folded)
Seat 3: darkalwin didn't bet (folded)
Seat 4: label55 didn't bet (folded)
Seat 5: Figo73 (button) didn't bet (folded)
Seat 6: csulok (small blind) showed and won ($51.80) with a full house, Sixes full of Threes
Seat 7: Woolshed (big blind) folded before the Flop
Seat 8: makareena is sitting out
Seat 9: Donjacky folded on the Flop
|
Comments |
|
1
| 1
|
Cooperstown   United States. Nov 30 2008 06:23. Posts 457 | | |
This is full ring, what are you beating? It's 25nl you can find way better spots then this. |
|
I dont remember anything from last night. all i know is, is that i woke up naked on my couch, with a piece of uncooked chicken on the stove. -Josh McLeod | |
|
| 1
|
Artanis[Xp]   Netherlands. Nov 30 2008 06:37. Posts 4697 | | |
being able to find better spots is 100% irrelevant, if he can get it in +EV he should do it.
That said, I don't think it's a good idea to stack off with a small overpair here vs an UTG raiser. |
|
| 1 | |
this guy was a caller, but ya, I hear you. I think I thought it was a 6max table but even so iunno if I"m ever good |
|
| 1
|
nolan   Ireland. Nov 30 2008 06:42. Posts 6205 | | |
| On November 30 2008 05:37 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
being able to find better spots is 100% irrelevant |
this isn't necessarily true, in my humble opinion. |
|
On September 08 2008 10:07 Baal wrote: my head is a gyroscope, your argument is invalid | |
|
| 1
|
Critterer   United Kingdom. Nov 30 2008 06:46. Posts 5337 | | |
really though, you are not really much ahead of a single hand ... even 99 has an oesd lol
definitely a case of marginally ahead/flipping or crushed hand |
|
LudaHid: dam.ned dam.ned dam.ned. LudaHid: dam.ned northwooden as..hole | |
|
| 1
|
Artanis[Xp]   Netherlands. Nov 30 2008 06:46. Posts 4697 | | |
| On November 30 2008 05:42 nolan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 30 2008 05:37 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
being able to find better spots is 100% irrelevant |
this isn't necessarily true, in my humble opinion.
|
I would assume a poker player's goal is to max his winrate, rather then go for a safe ~2-3ptbb and never improve and get stuck at low-midstakes, but I'm sure there are exceptions. (not meant sarcastically) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|