PokerStars Game #23937780885: Holdem No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2009/01/15 18:38:58 ET
Table Margot IV 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: FeARFaCT ($136.30 in chips)
Seat 2: MarGee1 ($249.15 in chips)
Seat 3: jmill2525x ($106.50 in chips)
Seat 4: Dave Carlson ($100 in chips)
Seat 5: wlad1975 ($98.85 in chips)
Seat 6: hubmaster ($100 in chips)
Seat 7: Kfuse ($118.65 in chips)
Seat 8: vanDittrich ($43.95 in chips)
Seat 9: tylerwalsh ($249.15 in chips)
FeARFaCT: posts small blind $0.50
MarGee1: posts big blind $1
Holecards(Odds) Dealt to FeARFaCT
jmill2525x: folds
Dave Carlson: raises $3 to $4
wlad1975: folds
hubmaster: folds
Kfuse: folds
vanDittrich: folds
tylerwalsh: calls $4
FeARFaCT: raises $13 to $17
MarGee1: folds
Dave Carlson: folds
tylerwalsh: calls $13
FeARFaCT: bets $23
tylerwalsh: raises $209.15 to $232.15 and is all-in
tylerwalsh said, "lets go"
FeARFaCT: calls $96.30 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($112.85) returned to tylerwalsh
FeARFaCT   United States. Jan 15 2009 18:47. Posts 496
Total random player. I have maybe 60 hands on him and he's played 40%. We're both larger stacks so I was considering my options a bit more. I checked him out quick on pokertableratings and saw he was a steady 9BB/100 loser so I called after that. I'm thinking this is probably a fold vs a winning reg tho? Although I don't know any 100nl regs that would overshove the flop like this either probably. Is this usually a call vs a random unknown though? I probably would have ended up calling in the end anyways but pokertableratings took the thinking out of it for me.