Show hand : 641064

Handnr: 641064
Submitted by : Exhilarate

PokerStars Game #25349707634: Holdem No Limit ($2/$4) - 2009/02/25 17:12:44 ET
Table Adhafera II 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: nambsher ($408 in chips)
Seat 2: SashiStar ($172 in chips)
Seat 3: hypnotik72 ($641 in chips)
Seat 4: Hero ($425 in chips)
Seat 5: slammedfire ($400 in chips)
Seat 6: syn87 ($672.20 in chips)
Seat 7: maggiejames ($796.10 in chips)
Seat 8: fumbo420 ($406 in chips)
Seat 9: janetlee123 ($433 in chips)
nambsher: posts small blind $2
SashiStar: posts big blind $4

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero
hypnotik72: calls $4
Hero: raises $12 to $16
slammedfire: folds
syn87: folds
maggiejames: folds
fumbo420: folds
janetlee123: calls $16
nambsher: folds
SashiStar: folds
hypnotik72: folds

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $42.00)

   
Hero: bets $30
janetlee123: calls $30

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $102.00)

   
Hero: bets $72
janetlee123: raises $108 to $180
Hero: raises $199 to $379 and is all-in
janetlee123: calls $199

River (Pot : $860.00)

   

Showdown
Hero: shows (three of a kind, Threes)
janetlee123: shows (three of a kind, Tens)
janetlee123 collected $857 from pot

Summary
Total pot $860 | Rake $3
Board  
Seat 1: nambsher (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: SashiStar (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: hypnotik72 folded before Flop
Seat 4: Hero showed and lost with three of a kind, Threes
Seat 5: slammedfire folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: syn87 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 7: maggiejames folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 8: fumbo420 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 9: janetlee123 (button) showed and won ($857) with three of a kind, Tens

Comments

LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Feb 25 2009 17:16. Posts 15163 The PF Raise is interesting 93% Sure!

Artanis[Xp]   Netherlands. Feb 25 2009 17:21. Posts 4697   On February 25 2009 16:16 LemOn[5thF] wrote: The PF Raise is standard fyp

LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Feb 25 2009 17:27. Posts 15163 Wow really? I always thought you always call with ducks and simmilar, should I actually actively raise to restrict the pot? I know I got good EV against almost anything but overpair but I also believed that more limopers=more profit when set hits 93% Sure! Last edit: 25/02/2009 17:29

Artanis[Xp]   Netherlands. Feb 25 2009 17:33. Posts 4697   On February 25 2009 16:27 LemOn[5thF] wrote: Wow really? I always thought you always call with ducks and simmilar, should I actually actively raise to restrict the pot? I know I got good EV against almost anything but overpair but I also believed that more limopers=more profit when set hits You're raising at this level so people can't put you squarely on a hand like that and to protect against people that try to squeeze preflop which puts you in a bad situation. When you open here, you get the betting lead and a raised pot making it more likely to get paid off when you do hit your set. In limped pots you just don't get paid off a lot on your sets since there is no money in the pot, and you rarely win the pot when you don't hit a set.   Last edit: 25/02/2009 17:33

All hands submitted by Exhilarate: