Show hand : 657789

Handnr: 657789
Submitted by : jase

Full Tilt Poker Game #11267798529: $2 + $0.15 Heads Up Sit & Go (84701183), Table 1 - 10/20 - No Limit Hold'em - 2:44:45 ET - 2009/03/22
Seat 1: Ace1942 (1,450)
Seat 2: xghjase (1,550)
xghjase posts the small blind of 10
Ace1942 posts the big blind of 20
The button is in seat #2

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to xghjase
xghjase calls 10
Ace1942 raises to 60
xghjase calls 40

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $120.00)

   
Ace1942 bets 60
xghjase raises to 160
Ace1942 raises to 300
xghjase calls 140

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $720.00)

   
Ace1942 bets 1,090, and is all in
xghjase calls 1,090
Ace1942 shows
xghjase shows

River (Pot : $2,900.00)

   
Ace1942 shows a straight, Five high
xghjase shows two pair, Threes and Twos
Ace1942 wins the pot (2,900) with a straight, Five high

Summary
Total pot 2,900 | Rake 0
Board:
Seat 1: Ace1942 (big blind) showed and won (2,900) with a straight, Five high
Seat 2: xghjase (small blind) showed and lost with two pair, Threes and Twos

Comments

SemPeR   Canada. Mar 25 2009 02:09. Posts 2288 Not sure what your reads are here, but even if you're ahead a lot of the time, against a complete lagtard you're going to have much much better spots to get it in. If he's going to be spazzing out with overcards then 4x and Tx are going to be in his range too. hands like 56 you're flipping against, and there are very few turns you're happy getting your money in with (especially since the 5x gives like 50% of his flop range more outs). Basically if he's bad enough for you to limp-call 32s (which I would fold at the 2s since it's harder to get people off shit like middle pair) expecting a profit (from strong draws, made hands, etc), then there's no reason to put 1/5th of your stack in with bottom pair no kicker. Side note: I would almost always minraise this hand over limping it, just makes it easier to play postflop. We can usually just cbet fold.

All hands submitted by jase: