PokerStars Game #28104875529: Holdem No Limit ($1/$2) - 2009/05/12 8:21:49 ET
Table Hercules V 9-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: Ya-Boy-Bizzy ($98 in chips)
Seat 2: spewintothis ($200 in chips)
Seat 4: KOCMOHABT78 ($196 in chips)
Seat 5: badgers_uk ($221.35 in chips)
Seat 6: TMichaelT ($274.60 in chips)
Seat 7: gl79 ($200 in chips)
Seat 8: rockman255 ($206 in chips)
Seat 9: dryath ($200 in chips)
badgers_uk: posts small blind $1
TMichaelT: posts big blind $2
KeyleK_uk   United Kingdom. May 12 2009 08:32. Posts 1687
erm this is ok depending on reads - well played infact if you think he could be bluffing b c/c c/c looks good, it's a little bit of a shame theres not flush draw on the flop so he can't have that, but his range could in theory be so wide that there is very little people can give advice wise here. He could have a king, he could have an eight feasably (unlikely though) he could have a boat... He could have any random inside straight draws from the flop (or of course the QJ) it's a judgement call based on game flow and history for you here, I hope you made the right decision. But if you think he could well be bluffing in these kind of spots the hand is played well. If you think he's betting for value don't level yourself into thinking you're ahead, the only thing he can really valueown himself with here is JJ (or maybe some R-tarted AT)
poker is soooo much easier when you flop sets
1
rockman255   Canada. May 12 2009 08:34. Posts 4471
to me the reason i wanted to make this call is that his range is polarized to sets and pocket pairs because his preflop range is so tight and i really dont expect him to have AK since he 3bets it so much, hes very tiny range
but that said its probably better call if river pairs up one of the lower set cards on flop and not the turn pairing
but then it becomes really theres no kings, so its like set or bluff = call, to me, i guess is what i figure
rockman255: its not easy being superman U N0 MySteeZ: mega man. rockman255: same thing U N0 MySteeZ: no