PokerStars Game #3728895608: Hold'em No Limit ($10/$20) - 2006/01/23 - 05:07:03 (ET)
Table 'Rigilkent' Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: snake8484 ($3681 in chips)
Seat 2: Hookz ($5734 in chips)
Seat 3: i_win_dollar ($1934 in chips)
Seat 5: Nazgul18 ($3126.50 in chips)
Seat 6: Hold_emNL ($13594 in chips)
Seat 9: UNC LAW ($2985 in chips)
Hold_emNL: posts small blind $10
UNC LAW: posts big blind $20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Hookz ]
snake8484: folds
Hookz: raises $60 to $80
i_win_dollar: folds
Nazgul18: folds
Hold_emNL: raises $180 to $260
UNC LAW: folds
Hookz: calls $180
*** FLOP *** ]
Hold_emNL: bets $380
Hookz: calls $380
*** TURN *** ]
Hold_emNL: bets $1160
Hookz: calls $1160
*** RIVER *** ]
Hold_emNL: bets $11794 and is all-in
Hookz: calls $3934 and is all-in
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Hold_emNL: shows ] (high card Ace)
Hookz: shows ] (two pair, Aces and Tens)
Hookz collected $11485 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $11488 | Rake $3
Board ]
Seat 1: snake8484 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: Hookz showed ] and won ($11485) with two pair, Aces and Tens
Seat 3: i_win_dollar folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: Nazgul18 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: Hold_emNL (small blind) showed ] and lost with high card Ace
Seat 9: UNC LAW (big blind) folded before Flop
1
|
1
|
Hookz   Canada. Jan 23 2006 04:09. Posts 24 | | |
|
|
1
| |
i guess hold_em was kinda pissed after that his open ended + flush didnt hit |
|
| Last edit: 23/01/2006 04:15 |
|
|
1
|
StimRice   United States. Jan 23 2006 04:15. Posts 314 | | |
|
|
1
|
Hookz   Canada. Jan 23 2006 04:16. Posts 24 | | |
he was a tad but i really jus won my own money back he took a 4k and a 4.5k pot off me about 15 minutes before that so i only made like 2k off him
|
|
|
4
|
Baalim   Mexico. Jan 23 2006 04:18. Posts 34262 | | |
|
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
|
1
| |
Hookz, could you explain how you were thinking here? Was it all about the read you got on him or did his betsizes tell you something? |
|
|
1
|
Rocks2BeGood   Netherlands. Jan 23 2006 04:54. Posts 3582 | | |
very nice hand! damn |
|
|
|
1
| |
well i think he called because of top 2 pair
It was 2 low chance that guy had 1010 or AA AA playing it so far since he had 10 A
Only explanation is that he had 88 or 77 or 2 pair. But it seemed 2 unlikly how he played |
|
|
1
|
Hookz   Canada. Jan 25 2006 15:39. Posts 24 | | |
i called cuz we have history |
|
|
|