Show hand : 708495

Handnr: 708495
Submitted by : jasper5408

PokerStars Game #29655233076: Holdem No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2009/06/22 10:51:44 ET
Table Dollfus III 6-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: metabaron 2 ($24 in chips)
Seat 2: Hero ($25.50 in chips)
Seat 4: 7th Viruz ($24.65 in chips)
Seat 5: Ariandar ($27.65 in chips)
Seat 6: MaLoToZ ($26.75 in chips)
MaLoToZ: posts small blind $0.10
metabaron 2: posts big blind $0.25

Holecards
Dealt to Hero
Hero: raises $0.75 to $1
7th Viruz: folds
Ariandar: calls $1
MaLoToZ: folds
metabaron 2: folds

Flop (Pot : $2.35)

   
Hero: bets $1.50
Ariandar: calls $1.50

Turn (Pot : $5.35)

   
Hero: bets $3.50
Ariandar: calls $3.50

River (Pot : $12.35)

   
Hero: bets $7
sorheim has returned
Ariandar: folds
Uncalled bet ($7) returned to Hero
Hero collected $11.75 from pot
Hero: doesnt show hand

Summary
Total pot $12.35 | Rake $0.60
Board  
Seat 1: metabaron 2 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: Hero collected ($11.75)
Seat 4: 7th Viruz folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: Ariandar (button) folded on the River
Seat 6: MaLoToZ (small blind) folded before Flop

Comments

jasper5408   United States. Jun 22 2009 15:09. Posts 820 pretty standard i guess, i think board pairing 77's killed my action i think. should i just make a nubier bet on the river? i have no idea wat to expect he had. i feel like a pair of queens with a flush draw would have shipped it against me, but then again not all players adapt. maybe he had QJ with clubs and couldn't call river i dunno.

rednalluk   Sweden. Jun 22 2009 15:17. Posts 626 Adapt to what? Also, i think that a check on river might be slightly more profitable if your villain is capable of bluffing/v-being thin. He will probably check behind alot, but he will probably fold alot more to your bet on river. Also, you might want to bet alittle bigger but thats just me. If the fish want to see a rivercard, betting 3.5-4.25 wont make a difference.

All hands submitted by jasper5408: