I thought my turn bet would prevent him from checking draws, and let me know if I'm beat (I expected him to shove 2p+), I check to call all of the whiffed draws.. or am I just value owning myself by c/c'ing? aghh

is my reasoning sound or retarded vs a random reggish person?

sounds like "betting to see where you're at"

i prolly bet/call flop and c/f turn

On July 27 2009 03:37 collegesucks wrote: sounds like "betting to see where you're at" i prolly bet/call flop and c/f turn

yah but it isn't really that 1 dimensional

If he has a weaker ace, he's calling w/ that which he would likely check behind (he could raise this because of the drawy flop)
he's flatting most draws which I'm getting value from, and not letting take a free card

I just don't think I'm ever getting bluffed by anything except like 9Tss so I expect to be playing perfectly vs his range

This could all be bullshit ofc, any thoughts?

b/c, c/f seems shitty because we have to be folding the best hand vs a draw with a way high frequency... I'd think?

i'm pretty sure the nitty regs of 50nl would check back all of their draws and bet only with hands that beat yours on the turn

+ him having a worse ace is the least of my concern cuz what reg raises a worse ace there except maybe AQ

pretty true

may be giving too much credit for aggroness

i think turn is close between c-c and c-f, but probably c-f.

even though balancing prob isn't that big of a deal at 50nl, i would be checking to him on the turn with every hand i'm bet-calling flop with almost always. bet-calling flop ---> leading turn on this board is a bit of an unusual line, and sometimes unusual lines make other players do weird things (which isn't always bad, but i think counterproductive in this case).