Show hand : 725715

Handnr: 725715
Submitted by : genjix

PokerStars Game #31215515278: Holdem No Limit ($0.02/$0.05) - 2009/08/04 0:32:15 WET [2009/08/03 19:32:15 ET]
Table Pherkad IV 9-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 5: genjix ($20.30 in chips)
Seat 6: ramonafl1984 ($1.81 in chips)
Seat 7: c_treadway ($4.93 in chips)
ramonafl1984: posts small blind $0.02
c_treadway: posts big blind $0.05

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to genjix
genjix: raises $0.10 to $0.15
ramonafl1984: calls $0.13
c_treadway: calls $0.10

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $0.45)

   
ramonafl1984: checks
c_treadway: checks
genjix: bets $0.30
ramonafl1984: calls $0.30
c_treadway: raises $0.98 to $1.28
genjix: raises $8.42 to $9.70
ramonafl1984: calls $1.36 and is all-in
c_treadway: calls $3.50 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($4.92) returned to genjix

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $11.67)

   
BUGSY420111 joins the table at seat #4

River (Pot : $11.67)

   

Showdown
c_treadway: shows (a full house, Queens full of Threes)
genjix: mucks hand
c_treadway collected $5.94 from side pot
ramonafl1984: mucks hand
ramonafl1984 leaves the table
c_treadway collected $5.18 from main pot

Summary
Total pot $11.67 Main pot $5.18. Side pot $5.94. | Rake $0.55
Board  
Seat 5: genjix (button) mucked
Seat 6: ramonafl1984 (small blind) mucked
Seat 7: c_treadway (big blind) showed and won ($11.12) with a full house, Queens full of Threes

Comments

Big_Rob_48   United States. Aug 03 2009 19:38. Posts 3432 this is really bad, try to bluff with outs and such, and not for stacks, and not in 3 way pots so much ... i'd wait a bit until you actually play against players where bluffing is required to win (which is a lot higher up in the limits than you would think, maybe 200 nl) My AIM sn if you want to chat: YoRobbyMiller

dryath   Australia. Aug 03 2009 19:54. Posts 1317   On August 03 2009 18:38 Big_Rob_48 wrote: this is really bad, try to bluff with outs and such, and not for stacks, and not in 3 way pots so much ... i'd wait a bit until you actually play against players where bluffing is required to win (which is a lot higher up in the limits than you would think, maybe 200 nl) This, but at 200nl you don't have to

Gsr_01_integ   United States. Aug 03 2009 19:57. Posts 826 nl5 now? losing less is winning

MayZerG   United Kingdom. Aug 03 2009 20:03. Posts 2123   On August 03 2009 18:57 Gsr_01_integ wrote: nl5 now? I like to hold all the nuts - CrownRoyal

genjix   China. Aug 03 2009 20:05. Posts 2677 i know... but i tend to get a read like the 1st player has a FD or nothing and the c/r is mostly bluffing, never has a 3 or a FH then i try to push them out of pots but they call anyway :/ Gsr: playing nl5 cos im experimenting If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

All hands submitted by genjix: