PokerStars Game #6256557216: Hold'em No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2006/09/12 - 00:40:16 (ET)
Table 'Grano' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Big_Rob_48 ($49.45 in chips)
Seat 2: BlueSteel33 ($96 in chips)
Seat 3: tiltn1 ($39.75 in chips)
Seat 4: BrnngLeaves ($62 in chips)
Seat 5: follamour ($23.50 in chips)
Seat 6: CaptainHomer ($5.25 in chips)
BlueSteel33: posts small blind $0.25
tiltn1: posts big blind $0.50
Holecards
Dealt to Big_Rob_48
BrnngLeaves: raises $1.50 to $2
follamour: folds
CaptainHomer: folds
Big_Rob_48: raises $4 to $6
BlueSteel33: folds
tiltn1: folds
BrnngLeaves: calls $4
Flop (Pot : $12.75)
BrnngLeaves: bets $7
Big_Rob_48: raises $15 to $22
BrnngLeaves: raises $34 to $56 and is all-in
Big_Rob_48: calls $21.45 and is all-in
Turn (Pot : $124.75)
River (Pot : $124.75)
BrnngLeaves said, "ouch"
Showdown
BrnngLeaves: shows (three of a kind, Sevens)
Big_Rob_48: shows (a pair of Kings)
BrnngLeaves said, "thank god"
BrnngLeaves collected $96.65 from pot
Summary
Total pot $99.65 | Rake $3
Board
Seat 1: Big_Rob_48 (button) showed and lost with a pair of Kings
Seat 2: BlueSteel33 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: tiltn1 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: BrnngLeaves showed and won ($96.65) with three of a kind, Sevens
Seat 5: follamour folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: CaptainHomer folded before Flop (didn't bet)
0
|
Moloch   United States. Sep 11 2006 22:44. Posts 6144 | | |
reraise more preflop, at leats to $7 |
|
|
|
4
|
Baalim   Mexico. Sep 11 2006 22:46. Posts 34262 | | |
|
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
|
1
|
0
|
Moloch   United States. Sep 11 2006 22:48. Posts 6144 | | |
it's too small, don't give your opponents that good odds to play perfectly against you when you're making your hand range very transparent. |
|
|
|
0
|
Moloch   United States. Sep 11 2006 22:48. Posts 6144 | | |
the beginners advice is reraising 4x pf but i think anywhere between 7 and 9 is fine |
|
|
|
1
| |
3x is standard as far as i know..
if you reraise more hands to 6 it wont be transparent and you probably keep in dominated hands or something |
|
|
1
|
Big_Rob_48   United States. Sep 11 2006 22:51. Posts 3432 | | |
hmm.... really u all think 4x? |
|
My AIM sn if you want to chat: YoRobbyMiller | |
|
|
4
|
Baalim   Mexico. Sep 11 2006 22:52. Posts 34262 | | |
| On September 11 2006 21:50 artpoker_yo wrote:
3x is standard as far as i know..
if you reraise more hands to 6 it wont be transparent and you probably keep in dominated hands or something |
i personally like to re-raise a bit more than 3x
4x is too big imo. |
|
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | Last edit: 11/09/2006 22:54 |
|
|
1
| |
for me usually
if someone raises 4x i 3x it
if they r 3x i make it 10bb
minraise i make it 8bb + 2bb per caller of initial minraise |
|
| Last edit: 11/09/2006 22:57 |
|
|
1
|
straate   Argentina. Sep 11 2006 22:55. Posts 2837 | | |
if your trying to get out 'set farmers' then the '4x or 3x' is irrelevant. if he has a huge stack you would need to raise more, short stack less. on 50nl if he has 50$ and you have 50$ you need to reraise him so he has to call at least 5$ more
in this situation relative stacks are 50$, so 7-8 would definately be +ev |
|
silverfox971: if this was a live game i would spit on you | |
|
|
|