PokerStars Game #6290808968: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2006/09/15 - 00:48:02 (ET)
Table 'Turais V' 6-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: Pokamastah1 ($387.25 in chips)
Seat 2: tbc79 ($250.70 in chips)
Seat 3: bberard34 ($481.90 in chips)
Seat 4: Crankers ($206.70 in chips)
Seat 5: ZeKGB ($285.95 in chips)
Seat 6: PCRFC5 ($81 in chips)
Crankers: posts small blind $1
ZeKGB: posts big blind $2
Holecards Dealt to tbc79
PCRFC5: folds
Pokamastah1: folds
tbc79: raises $6 to $8
bberard34: folds
Crankers: raises $17 to $25
ZeKGB: folds
tbc79: calls $17
Flop (Pot : $52)
Crankers: bets $30
tbc79: calls $30
Turn (Pot : $112)
Crankers: checks
tbc79: checks
River (Pot : $112)
Crankers: checks
tbc79: checks
Showdown Crankers: shows (a pair of Jacks)
tbc79: shows (a pair of Kings)
tbc79 collected $109 from pot
tbc79 said, "lucky ace on flop buddy"
Summary Total pot $112 | Rake $3
Board
Seat 1: Pokamastah1 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: tbc79 showed and won ($109) with a pair of Kings
Seat 3: bberard34 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: Crankers (small blind) showed and lost with a pair of Jacks
Seat 5: ZeKGB (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: PCRFC5 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
On September 14 2006 22:03 nastynate1985 wrote:
unrelated to the ace killing your action, ever ok to represent the flush there on the turn to get him off AK? or is nobody folding top pair at 200NL?
not in a repopped pot vs an action player...ever
unless exteremely deepstacked
silverfox971: if this was a live game i would spit on you
0
tbc   Korea (South). Sep 14 2006 23:09. Posts 1081
On September 14 2006 22:03 nastynate1985 wrote:
unrelated to the ace killing your action, ever ok to represent the flush there on the turn to get him off AK? or is nobody folding top pair at 200NL?
not in a repopped pot vs an action player...ever
unless exteremely deepstacked
I learned something new!!
The secret to happiness is no more a secret than our willingness to choose life