The NL50 HU is a goldmine, either ridiculously straight forward regs or fish so far

Or was I just lucky with table selection?

um ok you 4b bluffed someone, gj.

On November 26 2009 15:48 joLin wrote: um ok you 4b bluffed someone, gj.

Stop wanking your e-penis and reply like a human, this hand is a pointless brag totally unrelated to my question.

What is wrong with some people trying to troll at every opportunity :D

my point being what is the point of bragging about this lol its clearly a very bad play and he just happened to fold which he will a certain % of the time but to pick 72o to do it with is terrible.

edit: ok you editted 'pointless' into your post.

well, obviously nl50 is very crushable. The question is if you can crush it, which you are to find out if you play some hands ^^

On November 26 2009 15:52 auffenpuffer wrote: well, obviously nl50 is very crushable. The question is if you can crush it, which you are to find out if you play some hands ^^

What a great wisdom sir

So I was not just lucky?
The couple regs I was playing were playing Hu like 6Max, hardly any remotely thin plays, and the fish were just fish, if this is anything close to standard NL50 HU villains I might as well switch.

Not that 6max is not easy, I just get bored too much and spew like a tard

On November 26 2009 15:52 joLin wrote: my point being what is the point of bragging about this lol its clearly a very bad play and he just happened to fold which he will a certain % of the time but to pick 72o to do it with is terrible. edit: ok you editted 'pointless' into your post.

Yes I did, and I don't know whats wrong with a little metagame and wanking my own e-penis (but not on the expense of people from my own community)

This is all idiotic.