PokerStars Game #40965148159: Holdem No Limit ($0.25/$0.50 USD) - 2010/03/10 20:55:05 WET [2010/03/10 15:55:05 ET]
Table Mayall II 6-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 2: Newqbrown ($50 in chips)
Seat 3: qqch13 ($53.95 in chips)
Seat 4: DoC.LemOn ($92.70 in chips)
Seat 5: Gregh2177 ($50 in chips)
Seat 6: TheFox_NYC ($25 in chips)
TheFox_NYC: posts small blind $0.25
Newqbrown: posts big blind $0.50
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to DoC.LemOn
qqch13: folds
DoC.LemOn: raises $1 to $1.50
Gregh2177: folds
TheFox_NYC: raises $2 to $3.50
Newqbrown: folds
DoC.LemOn: calls $2
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $7.50)
TheFox_NYC: bets $4.50
DoC.LemOn: raises $84.70 to $89.20 and is all-in
TheFox_NYC: calls $17 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($67.70) returned to DoC.LemOn
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $50.50)
River (Pot : $50.50)
PokerChipKKD joins the table at seat #1
Showdown
TheFox_NYC: shows (two pair, Aces and Threes)
DoC.LemOn: shows (a pair of Threes)
TheFox_NYC collected $48.50 from pot
Summary
Total pot $50.50 | Rake $2
Board
Seat 2: Newqbrown (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: qqch13 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 4: DoC.LemOn showed and lost with a pair of Threes
Seat 5: Gregh2177 (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: TheFox_NYC (small blind) showed and won ($48.50) with two pair, Aces and Threes
1
|
Exhilarate   United States. Mar 10 2010 15:59. Posts 5453 | | |
id calldown and openshove if i hit my flush |
|
|
1
|
vlseph   United States. Mar 10 2010 16:05. Posts 3026 | | |
|
The only hands a nit balances in his range are the nuts, the second nuts, and the third nuts. | |
|
|
1
| |
| On March 10 2010 14:59 Exhilarate wrote:
id calldown and openshove if i hit my flush |
vilain have 17$ behind
|
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Mar 10 2010 16:10. Posts 15163 | | |
yeye thats what I was thinking...
But then again I didn't shove yet this session and it made me feel like a girl
|
|
|
|
1
|
Exhilarate   United States. Mar 10 2010 16:12. Posts 5453 | | |
yeah didnt notice, then i'd just fold pf cuz it looks like he made a min3b and his range is AA/KK pretty much |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Mar 10 2010 16:12. Posts 15163 | | |
and exhilerate is right, he was likely to be terribad and bet turn tiny like all the fish do and always pay off.
But again for the reason above I went for the always + ev but probably worse option |
|
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Mar 10 2010 16:13. Posts 15163 | | |
And I called because I didn't think that, he had decent PFR% Exhilerate, how the hell can you tell me his range is AA KK without no reads you sick nit :D |
|
93% Sure! | Last edit: 10/03/2010 16:14 |
|
|
1
|
Exhilarate   United States. Mar 10 2010 16:13. Posts 5453 | | |
nah, you played it fine postflop, but in these spots when u know exactly what their hand range is i'd prefer to have at least 100bbs. |
|
|
4
|
Bigbobm   United States. Mar 10 2010 16:16. Posts 5511 | | |
everything about this hand is super standard imo |
|
Its time to stop thinking like a bitch and think smart like a poker player - ket | |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Mar 10 2010 16:17. Posts 15163 | | |
Ye this is the most standard line, my point is that against some fish calling is a better option. |
|
|
|
4
|
Bigbobm   United States. Mar 10 2010 16:25. Posts 5511 | | |
why? dont be results oriented, we can often be up against much worse here and shoving here gets us a ton of fold equity |
|
Its time to stop thinking like a bitch and think smart like a poker player - ket | |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Mar 10 2010 16:31. Posts 15163 | | |
ye just saying some, I didnt have proper reads shove is good.
With some fish (well, many at NL50) you know that if he bets this size he hit the flop and/or is never folding (with a arandom 9 or whatever draw), and also with so many fish betting them gay 1/2 pots at this limit you calling can be more +ev indeed.
|
|
93% Sure! | Last edit: 10/03/2010 16:31 |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Mar 10 2010 16:42. Posts 15163 | | |
And I was seriously considering the line on the flop because I knew he wasn't folding, I'm the last to be results oriented -.- |
|
|
|
|