Legend is a seriously insane monkey and I'm super excited to try and get all-in with him by the river, Quickisdeadly I haven't noticed much from over 86 hands. He is 39/14/0% 3bet, other stats meaningless.

Is this river a standard x/f regardless of their betsize? (obv if its like $5 I'm calling)

i bet the turn bigger to start with.

yeah bet bigger turn and as played i call

wow yah turn bet is too small.. dunno wtf I'm thinking

I'm not clear on how that changes my river decision

or is river a standard valuebet? I figure not since Acxc got there

welcome back

thanks bob.. here to spam retarded HHs again


calling ranges


Board: Qc 8c 6h 4s As
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 66.667% 57.58% 09.09% 228 36.00 { AQs, AcJc, AcTc, Ac9c, Ac7c, Ac6c, Ac5c, Ac4c, Ac3c, Ac2c, KQs, QJs, 75s, AQo, KQo, QJo }
Hand 1: 33.333% 24.24% 09.09% 96 36.00 { KQs, KQo }

with QT

Board: Qc 8c 6h 4s As
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 53.659% 46.34% 07.32% 228 36.00 { AQs, AcJc, AcTc, Ac9c, Ac7c, Ac6c, Ac5c, Ac4c, Ac3c, Ac2c, KQs, QTs+, 75s, AQo, KQo, QTo+ }
Hand 1: 46.341% 39.02% 07.32% 192 36.00 { KQs, KQo }


after further play I think my fold vs this villain was probably good, he never ever has Qx (aside from AQ) here.. still comments on in-general are good.

A 39/14 is playing any two suited cards. He could easily show up with K2cc or other garbage on the river.

snapcall

and how can you not notice him when he was in 30+ hands already? Boo -.-

But I betfold probably depending on his wtsd and reads.

I can't see myself check folding ever if my reads are only that.

its probably a bet fold... equity vs his calling range is less than 50% but x/c x/f seem pretty bad and might just be self value owning..

How is it less than 50?
Oh wait I see, you actually only give him nut flush draws and betting aces?

Just because of his aggression factor over such small sample?

but you do give him QJo... does not compute